2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00673.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term effect of an oral healthcare programme on oral hygiene in a nursing home

Abstract: This article reports on the long-term effect of an oral healthcare programme aimed at improving and maintaining the oral hygiene of elderly residents in a nursing home. The method was based on (i) motivation and oral-care training of the nursing staff, (ii) production of picture-based oral-care procedure cards, (iii) distribution of adequate oral-care equipment, (iv) practical implementation of new routines, and (v) assessment of results attained. The level of oral hygiene in the nursing home was assessed usin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
35
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with previous studies, where education of nurses in oral health and periodontal disease has generally remained a low priority in training programmes (Samson et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding is consistent with previous studies, where education of nurses in oral health and periodontal disease has generally remained a low priority in training programmes (Samson et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The aim of the quasi‐experimental nonrandomized study by Samson et al. was to register the long‐term effect of an oral healthcare education programme for nurses in care homes aimed at improving and maintaining the oral health of the residents. The programme, presented by dentists, dental hygienists and competent nurses, included motivation training and a 4‐hour theoretical and practical course.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores between 2 and 4 describe good or acceptable oral hygiene. MPS≥5 reflects un-acceptable/poor oral hygiene, and this score has been selected by experienced clinicians in previous studies according to the severity of the recorded oral hygiene status [27], [28], [31]. A criteria catalog with photos, showing examples of all the various conditions according to the graded scores, was presented for visual calibration [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%