2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(10)60016-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Effect of No-Tillage on Soil Organic Carbon Fractions in a Continuous Maize Cropping System of Northeast China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
18
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
18
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown that conservation tillage methods (shallow tillage, reduced tillage and no‐tillage) are capable of conserving soil organic carbon (Baker et al ., ; Chivenge et al ., ; Sommer et al ., ). However, some studies have shown that although the use of NT practices can increase the C content stored in surface residues and in the top few centimetres of the soil, they do not necessarily increase overall SOC storage (Yang & Wander, ; Huang et al ., ). Our results indicate when straw was returned, the SOC content of NT was less than that of other tillage treatments (Figure ) in the surface soil (0–20 cm), but also that CT was 12.5% greater than RT, 16.3% greater than SST and 12.7% greater than NT at 20–40 cm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies have shown that conservation tillage methods (shallow tillage, reduced tillage and no‐tillage) are capable of conserving soil organic carbon (Baker et al ., ; Chivenge et al ., ; Sommer et al ., ). However, some studies have shown that although the use of NT practices can increase the C content stored in surface residues and in the top few centimetres of the soil, they do not necessarily increase overall SOC storage (Yang & Wander, ; Huang et al ., ). Our results indicate when straw was returned, the SOC content of NT was less than that of other tillage treatments (Figure ) in the surface soil (0–20 cm), but also that CT was 12.5% greater than RT, 16.3% greater than SST and 12.7% greater than NT at 20–40 cm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This can be explained first by tillage causing soil disturbance which causes a size reduction in soil aggregates and exposes protected organic matter to microbial decomposition and increases the losses of labile C (Elliott, ; Chen et al ., ,b). Second, reductions in the intensity of tillage operations allow more stable soil aggregate formation (Huang et al ., ), as reduced tillage promotes the formation of interaggregate organic matter, which in turn binds together soil particles and strengthens soil structure. In the present study, the most disruptive tillage treatment was CT followed by RT and SST with least disruption caused by NT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In China, the arable land originated from the reclamation of grassland since the 1950s has reached 1.93×10 7 hm 2 , approximately accounting for 5% of the total area of the existing grassland (Su et al, 2005), and accordingly resulted in the great change in soil C stock. In China, it has been extensively studied about the effect of the cultivation on the soil C pool, but most of the studies were mainly focused on the agricultural ecosystems (Zhang et al, 2007;Ma et al, 2007;Liang et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2010) and few on the grassland (Wu and Tiessen, 2002;Su et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2011a). Wang et al (2011a) synthesized 133 papers published in the last 10 years on the effects on soil C of grassland management and related land use conversions in China, of these publications, only 19 reported about the conversion from grassland to cropland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results were similar to the observations by Yang & Wander () and Huang et al . (), who also found no overall change in SOC content within a short period. It appears difficult to raise the whole SOC content of soil over short periods (≤30 weeks).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%