2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long term effect of visual screening on oral cancer incidence and mortality in a randomized trial in Kerala, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
184
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
11
184
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, most of the publications in oral cancer screening is based on observational, case cohort studies, but there is only single ongoing randomized controlled trail in Kerala, India using visual inspection and their most recent results concluded a sustained reduction in oral cancer mortality during the 15-year follow-up (Sankaranarayanan et al, 2013). The latest update of the ongoing Cochrane systematic review stated that this study is associated with great degree of bias (Brocklehurst et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, most of the publications in oral cancer screening is based on observational, case cohort studies, but there is only single ongoing randomized controlled trail in Kerala, India using visual inspection and their most recent results concluded a sustained reduction in oral cancer mortality during the 15-year follow-up (Sankaranarayanan et al, 2013). The latest update of the ongoing Cochrane systematic review stated that this study is associated with great degree of bias (Brocklehurst et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,25 There is evidence for the use of DCPs and clinicians other than GDPs to detect caries and to screen for oral cancer. [26][27][28][29] Judgement under uncertainty favours safety and the only randomised controlled trial (RCT) that has examined screening for oral cancer used allied health providers, not GDPs, to undertake the screen. 28,30 The interviews from the Netherlands also highlight the need for rigorous evaluation of direct access.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, randomized controlled trials have measured the impacts on mortality of visual inspection (VI) of the cervix followed by treatment of precancerous and cancerous lesions when implemented by different cadres of health workers with varying frequency (Sankaranarayanan et al, 2007;Sankaranarayanan et al, 2009;Shastri et al, 2014). In the case of oral cancer, a trial involving 191,872 individuals in Kerala, although underpowered to detect statistically significant reductions in mortality among all eligible individuals, found that screening was efficacious among those who adhered to three or four rounds of oral visual screening as well as among individuals using tobacco and/or alcohol, largely due to early detection and reductions in the incidence of advanced cancers (Sankaranarayanan et al, 2013). Breast cancer screening and early detection through clinical breast examinations are also being studied in India, with high rates of acceptance and adherence to diagnostic and treatment recommendations (Mittra et al, 2010;Sankaranarayanan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%