2002
DOI: 10.1139/x01-169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects of a forest amelioration experiment

Abstract: We evaluated the soil chemistry, plant species composition, and forest growth rate on a site where a site amelioration project had been realized 30 years earlier. The initial goal of the project was the improvement of a site that had been degraded by litter raking. We wanted to know which amelioration method produced a sustainable result and how different treatments might be rated by today's standards. Treatments included fertilization, underplanting with N-fixing plants, and a combination of both. The amelior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is in accordance with experiments performed in other localities where Mg was revealed as deficient nutrient leading to needle yellowing and increasing thus risk of consequent forest decline (Huttl, Schneider 1998;Jandl et al 2002;Katzensteiner et al 1992b;Lomský et al 2006). Rate of stand response to Mg fertilization differed in relation to age and altitude of stand in our experiment, but both effects could not be evaluated separately because an age of stands was different in S and BS zones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This conclusion is in accordance with experiments performed in other localities where Mg was revealed as deficient nutrient leading to needle yellowing and increasing thus risk of consequent forest decline (Huttl, Schneider 1998;Jandl et al 2002;Katzensteiner et al 1992b;Lomský et al 2006). Rate of stand response to Mg fertilization differed in relation to age and altitude of stand in our experiment, but both effects could not be evaluated separately because an age of stands was different in S and BS zones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Peak litter removal by raking destroyed the acidneutralizing capacity more quickly than acid rain (Glatzel, 1991) and the combined effect of soil acidification and nutrient depletion was the principal cause of destabilization in forest ecosystems in central Europe, which led to mixed deciduous forests being replaced by, or areas replanted with, less nutrient-demanding conifer stands (Ebermayer, 1876 ;Wittich, 1954;Ellenberg, 1988;Jandl et al, 2002). Productivity in litter-harvested forests sank drastically in the 1800s ; the average decline in wood production of raked Kilian (1998) stands is thought to have been around 50 % (Jandl et al, 2002). The effects of long-term litter use persist for many decades after cessation of the harvesting practice and are still reflected in forest soils today in Austria (Glatzel, 1991;Jandl et al, 2002), Switzerland (Perruchoud et al, 1999), and Germany (Wittich, 1954;Kreutzer, 1972;Prietzel, Kolb & Rehfuess, 1997).…”
Section: Historical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous fertilization experiments have been carried out in these countries to Wnd out optimal fertilization regimes, and the issue remains a hot topic until today (e.g., Tamm et al 1995; Communicated by Franz Makeschin and Agustin Merino. Nohrstedt et al 2000;Nilsen and Abrahamsen 2003;McNulty et al 2005;Blevins et al 2006), including new aspects such as the inXuence of forest fertilization on the large scale N balance (Akselsson et al 2007), losses of greenhouse gases (e.g., Maljanen et al 2006), and the sequestration of atmospheric carbon in tree biomass (Iivonen et al 2006) and in forest soils (Akselsson et al 2007;Jandl et al 2002Jandl et al , 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%