Long-Term Effects of an Intensive Prevention Program After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Osteresch, Rico; Fach, Andreas; Frielitz, Fabian‐Simon; Meyer, Sven; Schmucker, Johannes; Rühle, Stephan; Retzlaff, Tina; Hadwiger, Moritz; Härle, Tobias; Elsässer, Albrecht; Katalinic, Alexander; Eitel, Ingo; Hambrecht, Rainer; Wienbergen, Harm

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.034

Cited by 15 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In Germany, a randomized control trial by Osteresch et al 12 evaluated the effectiveness between a telemedicine-based intensive prevention program (IPP) and UC for 12 months. Post-MI patients after 3 weeks of acute cardiac rehabilitation were randomly assigned to 12-month IPP (136 patients) or UC (139 patients).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advancing telemedicine in cardiology: A comprehensive review of evolving practices and outcomes in a postpandemic context

Huerne,

Eisenberg

2024

Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advancing telemedicine in cardiology: A comprehensive review of evolving practices and outcomes in a postpandemic context

Huerne,

Eisenberg

2024

Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A adesão ao regime farmacológico representa uma das formas de prevenção secundária de um novo evento de EAM. Por sua vez, o regime farmacológico correspondente ao tratamento da pessoa pós EAM, contempla a utilização de antiagregantantes plaquetários (99%), antihipertensores inibidores da enzima de conversão da angiotensina (IECA) + antihipertensores antagonistas do recetor da angiotensina II (ARA II) (99%) antidislipidémicos (97%), e, por fim, os antihipertensores betabloqueadores (89%) (Osteresch et al, 2021) (Chalifour, 2008);…”

Section: Intervenções De Enfermagem Na Adesão Ao Regime Farmacológicounclassified

Fatores Estressores Na Atividade Do Enfermeiro

Soccol,

Fossa,

Monaiar

et al. 2024

Enfermagem: Da Teoria À Prática Clínica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Editora Direitos para esta edição cedidos à Atena Editora pelos autores. Open access publication by Atena DECLARAÇÃO DOS AUTORES Os autores desta obra: 1. Atestam não possuir qualquer interesse comercial que constitua um conflito de interesses em relação ao artigo científico publicado; 2. Declaram que participaram ativamente da construção dos respectivos manuscritos, preferencialmente na: a) Concepção do estudo, e/ou aquisição de dados, e/ou análise e interpretação de dados; b) Elaboração do artigo ou revisão com vistas a tornar o material intelectualmente relevante; c) Aprovação final do manuscrito para submissão.; 3. Certificam que os artigos científicos publicados estão completamente isentos de dados e/ou resultados fraudulentos; 4. Confirmam a citação e a referência correta de todos os dados e de interpretações de dados de outras pesquisas; 5. Reconhecem terem informado todas as fontes de financiamento recebidas para a consecução da pesquisa; 6. Autorizam a edição da obra, que incluem os registros de ficha catalográfica, ISBN, DOI e demais indexadores, projeto visual e criação de capa, diagramação de miolo, assim como lançamento e divulgação da mesma conforme critérios da Atena Editora. DECLARAÇÃO DA EDITORA A Atena Editora declara, para os devidos fins de direito, que: 1. A presente publicação constitui apenas transferência temporária dos direitos autorais, direito sobre a publicação, inclusive não constitui responsabilidade solidária na criação dos manuscritos publicados, nos termos previstos na Lei sobre direitos autorais (Lei 9610/98), no art. 184 do Código Penal e no art. 927 do Código Civil; 2. Autoriza e incentiva os autores a assinarem contratos com repositórios institucionais, com fins exclusivos de divulgação da obra, desde que com o devido reconhecimento de autoria e edição e sem qualquer finalidade comercial; 3. Todos os e-book são open access, desta forma não os comercializa em seu site, sites parceiros, plataformas de ecommerce, ou qualquer outro meio virtual ou físico, portanto, está isenta de repasses de direitos autorais aos autores; 4. Todos os membros do conselho editorial são doutores e vinculados a instituições de ensino superior públicas, conforme recomendação da CAPES para obtenção do Qualis livro; 5. Não cede, comercializa ou autoriza a utilização dos nomes e e-mails dos autores, bem como nenhum outro dado dos mesmos, para qualquer finalidade que não o escopo da divulgação desta obra.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, 13 RCTs offered rehabilitation as part of the intervention [64,75,80,82,147,149,151,152,157,160,163,169,178]. mHealth solutions (eg, telephone calls, text messages, and apps) were primarily used in 56 RCTs [53,56,57,59,63,67,69,78-80, 83-86,90,92,93,96,99,101,102,105,108,110,112-115,119, 120,124,128-130,134,136,140-142,146-148,150,155,157,161,163, 164,167,168,172,176,177,179,181,185], whereas 22 RCTs [58,60,61,65,70,81,87,111,116,117,126,133,134,145,149,151,154,156,165,171,173,174] used mHealth combined with a device (eg, wearable, pedometer, activity tracker, or Bluetooth-connected pulse oximeter or glycosometer). Furthermore, 6 RCTs [75,89,118,158,169,183]…”

Section: Intervention Componentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mean number of digital sessions was 97.98 (SD 109.29; range 2-377), whereas in-person sessions had a mean of 3.26 (SD 2.93; range 0-18). Of the included RCTs, 31[54,58,62,65,70,76,77,82,84,86,88,92,94,95,100,101,112,121,132,135,143,144,146,150,151,155,163,164,174,182,186,[189][190][191]197] had follow-up data, and the mean follow-up time was 45.38 (SD 21.74; range 12-104) weeks.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Benefits and Harms of Digital Health Interventions Promoting Physical Activity in People With Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zangger¹,

Liaghat²,

Juhl³

et al. 2023

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Digital health interventions for managing chronic conditions have great potential. However, the benefits and harms are still unclear. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the benefits and harms of digital health interventions in promoting physical activity in people with chronic conditions. Methods We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to October 2022. Eligible randomized controlled trials were included if they used a digital component in physical activity promotion in adults with ≥1 of the following conditions: depression or anxiety, ischemic heart disease or heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, knee or hip osteoarthritis, hypertension, or type 2 diabetes. The primary outcomes were objectively measured physical activity and physical function (eg, walk or step tests). We used a random effects model (restricted maximum likelihood) for meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses to assess the impact of study-level covariates. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Results Of 14,078 hits, 130 randomized controlled trials were included. Compared with usual care or minimal intervention, digital health interventions increased objectively measured physical activity (end of intervention: standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.29, 95% CI 0.21-0.37; follow-up: SMD 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.31) and physical function (end of intervention: SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.12-0.59; follow-up: SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.01-0.57). The secondary outcomes also favored the digital health interventions for subjectively measured physical activity and physical function, depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life at the end of the intervention but only subjectively measured physical activity at follow-up. The risk of nonserious adverse events, but not serious adverse events, was higher in the digital health interventions at the end of the intervention, but no difference was seen at follow-up. Conclusions Digital health interventions improved physical activity and physical function across various chronic conditions. Effects on depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life were only observed at the end of the intervention. The risk of nonserious adverse events is present during the intervention, which should be addressed. Future studies should focus on better reporting, comparing the effects of different digital health solutions, and investigating how intervention effects are sustained beyond the end of the intervention. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42020189028; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=189028

show abstract

Long-Term Effects of an Intensive Prevention Program After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Cited by 15 publications

References 16 publications

Advancing telemedicine in cardiology: A comprehensive review of evolving practices and outcomes in a postpandemic context

Advancing telemedicine in cardiology: A comprehensive review of evolving practices and outcomes in a postpandemic context

Fatores Estressores Na Atividade Do Enfermeiro

Benefits and Harms of Digital Health Interventions Promoting Physical Activity in People With Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About