2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects of precommercial thinning on small mammals in northern Maine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, PCT could also have a long-term impact on the ground vegetation cover since high stocking is a severe limitation due to the reduction in light to the ground and the stocking is more important than the canopy species composition per se. (Hedwall et al 2013;Bataineh et al 2014) Similarly, positive response of PCT has been found for small mammals (Homyack et al 2005;Sullivan et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In general, PCT could also have a long-term impact on the ground vegetation cover since high stocking is a severe limitation due to the reduction in light to the ground and the stocking is more important than the canopy species composition per se. (Hedwall et al 2013;Bataineh et al 2014) Similarly, positive response of PCT has been found for small mammals (Homyack et al 2005;Sullivan et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In boreal mixedwood and black spruce sites in western Quebec, Cheveau (2003) found no difference in red-backed vole capture rates between diameterlimit cuts and controls. Studies of selection cutting, thinning, and other high-retention (typically 50%-70%) harvesting systems from other areas have shown either no significant effects (Brooks and Healy 1988, Klenner and Sullivan 2003, Fuller et al 2004, Gitzen 2006, or a positive effect (Monthey and Soutiere 1985, Medin and Booth 1989, Mahon 1998, Steventon et al 1998, Von Treba et al 1998, Homyack et al 2005, of harvesting on this species.…”
Section: Rodentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Short-tailed shrews are most common where there are moist microclimates associated with understory cover, herbaceous vegetation, and deciduous leaf litter (Miller and Getz 1977, Kuttner 2002, Fuller et al 2004. Studies from Maine (Fuller et al 2004, Homyack et al 2005 and Nova Scotia (Swan et al 1984) found that precommercial thinning, selection harvesting (to a residual basal area of 13 m 2 /ha), shelterwood harvesting (to a residual basal area of 9 m 2 /ha), and stripcutting did not significantly reduce shorttailed shrew abundance relative to mature stands. Another study from Maine (Monthey and Soutiere 1985), however, reported lower abundance in hardwood stands cut to a 40-cm diameter limit than in uncut stands.…”
Section: Northern Short-tailed Shrewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hagar et al, 2004;Homyack et al, 2005;Sullivan et al, 2005). Moreover, the impact of different thinning intensities is only just beginning to be explored (Hayes et al, 2003;Hagar et al, 2004;Sullivan et al, 2005Sullivan et al, , 2007.…”
Section: Stand Typementioning
confidence: 99%