2015
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)61167-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects of radiation exposure on health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
175
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
175
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that cardiac catheterization exposes patients to 15-fold more radiation than thoracic CTA (16). Exposure to ionizing radiation increases the lifetime risk of cancer (17), and children are generally more sensitive to radiation than adults for 25% of cancer types, including leukemia and cancers of the thyroid, skin, breast, and brain (18). Any decision to perform a procedure exposing a child to high levels of radiation should be made carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that cardiac catheterization exposes patients to 15-fold more radiation than thoracic CTA (16). Exposure to ionizing radiation increases the lifetime risk of cancer (17), and children are generally more sensitive to radiation than adults for 25% of cancer types, including leukemia and cancers of the thyroid, skin, breast, and brain (18). Any decision to perform a procedure exposing a child to high levels of radiation should be made carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it has recently been observed that the possible effects may also include cataracts and cardiovascular outcomes at lower doses than previously considered [5][6][7]. Doses required to produce deterministic changes are in most cases large (usually in excess of 1-2 Gy) as illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Stochastic and Deterministic Radiation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, the dose-response relation for cancer at low doses is assumed, for purposes of radiological protection, to be linear and without a threshold, but this has not been definitively confirmed for all exposure scenarios. An appropriate dose-response relation for the effects of low doses of radiation therefore remains to be established (Kamiya et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%