2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects of sequential cortical infarcts on scar size, brain volume and cognitive function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents a disadvantage because experimenters must choose their time point of analysis carefully. Acutely, damage might be missed and at later time points, owing to the complex dynamics of scar formation and phagocytosis, infarct size and tissue loss do not always match (Muller et al, 2008;Shanina et al, 2005).…”
Section: Light Microscopy and Macroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This represents a disadvantage because experimenters must choose their time point of analysis carefully. Acutely, damage might be missed and at later time points, owing to the complex dynamics of scar formation and phagocytosis, infarct size and tissue loss do not always match (Muller et al, 2008;Shanina et al, 2005).…”
Section: Light Microscopy and Macroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Because infarct size and tissue loss do not always match, an additional analysis of the remaining cortical tissue was performed at the level of the largest infarct extension. 9 …”
Section: Brain Tissue Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Because infarct size and tissue loss do not always match, an additional analysis of the remaining cortical tissue was performed at the level with the largest infarct extension. 11 Rats with infarcts extending to the striatum were excluded from further analysis (nϭ1). Gray value images of the coexposed plastic standards were used to compute a nonlinear calibration curve, which defined the relation-ship between gray values in the autoradiographs and concentrations of radioactivity.…”
Section: Brain Tissue Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%