2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02626-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the adalimumab biosimilar, PF-06410293, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after switching from reference adalimumab (Humira®) or continuing biosimilar therapy: week 52–92 data from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Abstract: Background/objective REFLECTIONS B538–02 is a randomized, double-blind comparative study of the adalimumab (ADL) biosimilar PF-06410293, (ADL-PF), and reference ADL sourced from the European Union (ADL-EU) in patients with active RA. Therapeutic equivalence was demonstrated based on ACR20 responses at week 12 (primary endpoint). We report long-term safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of ADL-PF in patients who continued ADL-PF treatment throughout 78 weeks or who switched from ADL-EU to ADL-PF … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ) to determine whether patients/caregivers could safely and effectively administer ADL-PF using a PFP device. The study design and inclusion criteria for the main study (NCT02480153) have been described in detail elsewhere [ 16 18 ]; features relevant to this sub-study of ADL-PF PFP are summarized below.
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 ) to determine whether patients/caregivers could safely and effectively administer ADL-PF using a PFP device. The study design and inclusion criteria for the main study (NCT02480153) have been described in detail elsewhere [ 16 18 ]; features relevant to this sub-study of ADL-PF PFP are summarized below.
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarity between treatments was maintained up to week 52, regardless of whether patients switched from ADL-EU to ADL-PF at week 26 (start of TP2) [ 17 ]. Long-term efficacy and safety of ADL-PF following 78 weeks of treatment was demonstrated during TP3 and was unaffected by switching from ADL-EU to ADL-PF at week 26 or week 52 [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In TP2 (weeks 26–52), patients receiving ADL-EU remained blinded and were rerandomised 1:1 at week 26 either to continue receiving ADL-EU or to switch to ADL-afzb 22. Throughout TP3 (weeks 52–78), all patients received open-label treatment with ADL-afzb 23…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main studies were conducted in compliance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. All patients provided informed consent prior to undergoing any screening procedures 7 10 20–23…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Roy M Fleischmann et al 9 is a randomized, double-blind comparative study of the adalimumab (ADL) biosimilar PF-06410293, (ADL-PF), and originator ADL sourced from the European Union (ADL-EU) in patients with active RA. Therapeutic equivalence was assessed based on ACR20 responses at week 12 (primary endpoint).…”
Section: Randomized Studies On Adalimumab Were Reviewedmentioning
confidence: 99%