1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01411282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term evaluation of EC-IC bypass patency

Abstract: The EC-IC Bypass Study Group could not detect any benefit from surgery compared to medical management in the prevention of stroke in 1985 [15]. During the past years surgical revascularization was re-evaluated and considered as an appropriate treatment for a small subgroup of patients with recurrent focal cerebral ischaemia and impaired haemodynamics. This retrospective study examines the long-term benefit and patency rate of bypass. We present a follow-up of 5.6 years of 47 patients, all of whom underwent byp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 In addition to these studies, other case series have documented EC-IC bypass graft patency rates between 90% and 96%. 8,29,38,40 In 1978, a literature review examining multiple case series of STA-MCA bypass procedures (376 total operations) reported a permanent neurological morbidity rate of 2.4%, an operative mortality rate of 4.3%, and an "other morbidity" rate of 13.6%. 38 Other surgical case series (from the same time period) that included between 100 and 415 patients undergoing STA-MCA bypass operations reported perioperative ischemic stroke rates and mortality rates of 2%-3.6% and 1.2%-3%, respectively.…”
Section: Retrospective Case Series Of Ec-ic Bypass For Ischemic Cerebmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23 In addition to these studies, other case series have documented EC-IC bypass graft patency rates between 90% and 96%. 8,29,38,40 In 1978, a literature review examining multiple case series of STA-MCA bypass procedures (376 total operations) reported a permanent neurological morbidity rate of 2.4%, an operative mortality rate of 4.3%, and an "other morbidity" rate of 13.6%. 38 Other surgical case series (from the same time period) that included between 100 and 415 patients undergoing STA-MCA bypass operations reported perioperative ischemic stroke rates and mortality rates of 2%-3.6% and 1.2%-3%, respectively.…”
Section: Retrospective Case Series Of Ec-ic Bypass For Ischemic Cerebmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,35,52 In a more recent series of 47 patients undergoing STA-MCA cortical branch anastomosis for symptoms related to hemodynamic cerebral ischemia, perioperative rates of morbidity, permanent neurological impairment, and mortality were reported to be 25.5%, 6.4%, and 2.1%, respectively. 40 In 2004, Mendelowitsch et al 29 published their results on 73 EC-IC bypass operations in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic ICA occlusion. They observed a 3% perioperative ischemic stroke rate and a 0% perioperative mortality rate.…”
Section: Retrospective Case Series Of Ec-ic Bypass For Ischemic Cerebmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] Unfortunately, such procedures carry a higher complication profile and lower patency rate than an arteryartery anastomosis of similar-sized vessels. 14,16,17 In 1978, Ausman et al were the first to describe the technique of salvaging the superficial temporal artery for bypass by first performing a subclavian-external carotid artery bypass, followed 6 weeks later by STA-MCA bypass in a patient with retinal ischemia. 18 In 1982, Senter and Long reported simultaneous subclavian-external carotid and STA-MCA bypass in 3 patients with hemispheric ischemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The choice of bypass procedure depends on the amount of flow replacement required, and the size and availability of donor and recipient vessels. Immediate results and management of the bypass 13,23,27 and clinical follow-up results 13,22,24 have been reported previously. However, factors related to symptomatic watershed infarction (WI) have not been analyzed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%