1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1997)20:4<461::aid-lsm13>3.0.co;2-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated with minimal conization by carbon dioxide laser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These exclusions are described individually in the results. The authors of several articles generously made original data available 3,4 or sent the original protocol and data collection forms 5 to assist in this analysis. We were unable to make contact with some others.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These exclusions are described individually in the results. The authors of several articles generously made original data available 3,4 or sent the original protocol and data collection forms 5 to assist in this analysis. We were unable to make contact with some others.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some of these, the authors kindly provided further information. 3,5 The article by Bekassy 3 was excluded because the ''women years at risk'' in any period in this study seemed to have been determined by the number of smear results reported in that period rather than the number of women under observation. A second study 6 was excluded because it proved impossible to determine recurrence rates in different intervals in spite of initial appearances to the contrary.…”
Section: The Search and Exclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to many studies not providing separate estimates of persistent disease vs. recurrent disease; even where this is done, there is no universal definition of the time frame for separating persistent from recurrent disease. For example, Bekassy found the cumulative risk of recurrent CIN after carbon dioxide laser for CIN 1–3 to be 0.89% at year 5, 1.36% at year 10, and 3.02% at year 15, after a primary success rate of 96.1% (13) . By contrast, Mitchell et al in a recent randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision of CIN 1–3 reported recurrent disease after only 6–37 months follow‐up in 19%, 13%, and 13% of subjects, respectively, (14) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a followup of the patients treated surgically is mandatory and the use of HPV-PCR is more sensitive than cytology alone for identifying response [Chua and Hjerpe, 1997]. The complete destruction of malignant tissue by laser must be replaced by surgical excision (laser, loop electrosurgical excision procedure, cold knife), allowing ad-equate histo-pathological examination of all excised tissue including the entire transformation zone and 5 mm of the endocervical canal [Béká ssy, 1997].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%