2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01170-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term follow-up of patients treated for traumatic injury regarding physical and psychological function and health-related quality of life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a response rate of 56% can be considered to be relatively satisfactory. Moreover, when comparing our response rate to that reported in earlier studies, it is clear that low response rates are a common occurrence (4)(5)(6)9) in studies regarding post-injury quality of life. Furthermore, the attrition rate has been shown to become even greater as time passes by (11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, a response rate of 56% can be considered to be relatively satisfactory. Moreover, when comparing our response rate to that reported in earlier studies, it is clear that low response rates are a common occurrence (4)(5)(6)9) in studies regarding post-injury quality of life. Furthermore, the attrition rate has been shown to become even greater as time passes by (11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Moreover, it is well described that in both minor (4,5) and severe injuries (6)(7)(8)(9)(10), the injury has a signi cant negative impact on the post-injury HR-QoL of the injured person. It is also apparent that the negative effect on HR-QoL after severe injury is a long-lasting condition/phenomenon (9,11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult trauma services often use return to work as an indicator of recovery. 17 Similarly, in children’s trauma management parents’ return to work may be a useful indicator of recovery and the family’s return to ‘normal’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data extracted from these studies were divided into those reporting on RTW up to 6 months and from 7 to 12 months (15 data points). Of the 14 studies (41-54) that reported on RTW up to 6 months, there were three studies (41,50,53) that had measured patients at more than one time point and two studies (43,44) that measured two groups of trauma patients. The pooled estimate of effect size was 0.52 (95% CI 0.43,0.6) (I 2 = 98.9%); i.e., 52% of the participants returned to some form of employment.…”
Section: Return-to-work (Rtw) 1a Back To Any Work (Yes or No)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pooled estimate of effect size was 0.52 (95% CI 0.43,0.6) (I 2 = 98.9%); i.e., 52% of the participants returned to some form of employment. There were 14 studies (45,47,48,50,53,(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)(62)(63) that reported on RTW up to 12 months, one of which had reported on two groups of trauma patients. The pooled estimate of effect size was 0.64 (95% CI 0.53,0.5) (I 2 = 99.2%); i.e., 64% of the participants returned to some form of employment.…”
Section: Return-to-work (Rtw) 1a Back To Any Work (Yes or No)mentioning
confidence: 99%