1989
DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90035-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term follow-up of potentiation of radiotherapy by cis-platinum in advanced cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This reduced dose intensity may reduce efficacy, as shown in a randomized trial of weekly CDDP doses of 25 mg/m 2 for cervical cancer [48]. However, 30 mg/m 2 of CDDP given weekly during RT had an 88% CR rate and an actuarial 4-year survival rate of 65% in patients with stage IIB-IVA disease, in a nonrandomized study [36].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reduced dose intensity may reduce efficacy, as shown in a randomized trial of weekly CDDP doses of 25 mg/m 2 for cervical cancer [48]. However, 30 mg/m 2 of CDDP given weekly during RT had an 88% CR rate and an actuarial 4-year survival rate of 65% in patients with stage IIB-IVA disease, in a nonrandomized study [36].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, this trial showed a preferential survival benefit for stage IB-IIB disease treated with concurrent cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil, while there was no survival or disease-free survival demonstrated for stages III-IVA. There are two other small, randomized trials of locally advanced cervix cancer testing cisplatinum-based concurrent chemotherapy that do not show a benefit of chemotherapy [84,85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomized controlled trials have shown that RT combined with platinum-based chemotherapy can increase the rate of local response and survival (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13), although others have failed to demonstrate such a difference (Leborgne F, 2000, unpublished data; referred to Green et al [12]) (14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%