2015
DOI: 10.5849/forsci.14-207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Pinus radiata Productivity Gains from Tillage, Vegetation Control, and Fertilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increment in diameter growth (IDG) and the increment in height growth (IHG) were calculated as the difference between initial measurements and those after 1 year following thinning. The individual volume of each tree was estimated through a function developed for young radiata pine used by Albaugh et al (2015), Eq. (3):…”
Section: Growth Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increment in diameter growth (IDG) and the increment in height growth (IHG) were calculated as the difference between initial measurements and those after 1 year following thinning. The individual volume of each tree was estimated through a function developed for young radiata pine used by Albaugh et al (2015), Eq. (3):…”
Section: Growth Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type C is similar to type B, where there is a positive response shortly after treatment; although the response will be partially or completely lost over time. Type D is observed as a negative growth response relative to an untreated control from the time of treatment initiation (Albaugh et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response to P fertilization at planting on P limited sites, but also treatments that reduce or eliminate hardwood competition (e.g., soil tillage, herbicide application) may result in a type A response (Zutter, Miller 1998;Nilsson, Allen 2003). A response is considered type B if growth increases in response to treatment relative to an untreated control occur for a short time after treatment, then the initial available resources are exhausted or are no longer available, and treated trees then stop responding (Albaugh et al 2015). Generally, midrotation nutrient applications on nutrient-limited sites result in a type B response (Miller 1981;Fox et al 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With increasing human interventions and the uniform ecosystem structure, plantation forests are an ideal managed ecosystem to characterize the coupling effects of human activities and natural environmental factors on biogeochemical and hydrological cycling on a large scale. Previous studies have reported the distinct, local-scale carbon, nitrogen, and water cycles in plantation forests as compared to naturally regenerated forests (e.g., Albaugh et al, 2012Albaugh et al, , 2015Sun and Vose, 2016;Gyawali and Burkhart, 2015;Vose et al, 2012;Hoover et al, 2014). Although the importance of plantation forests has been recognized, a representation of plantation management practices in current Earth system models is lacking (e.g., Tian et al, 2014;Pan et al, 2015), mainly due to few established relationships between management practices and ecosystem biogeochemical and hydrological cycling, as well as no available long-term and high-spatialresolution gridded plantation maps at regional and national scales (Escalante Fernandez et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%