Long-term improvements following a residential combined physical and psychological programme for chronic low back pain

Abstract

ObjectivesEvaluate the outcomes and explore experiences of patients undergoing a residential combined physical and psychological programme (CPPP) for chronic low back pain.DesignA longitudinal observational cohort design, with a parallel qualitative design using semistructured interviews.SettingResidential, multimodal rehabilitation.Participants136 adults (62 male/74 female) referred to the CPPP, 100 (44 male/56 female) of whom completed the programme, during the term of the study. Ten (2 male/8 female) participated in the qualitative evaluation.InterventionA 3-week residential CPPP.Outcome measuresPrimary outcome measures were the STarT Back screening tool score; pain intensity—11-point Numerical Rating Scale; function—Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); health status/quality of life—EQ-5D-5L EuroQol five-Dimension-five level; anxiety—Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7; depression—Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Secondary outcome measures were the Global Subjective Outcome Scale; National Health Service Friends and Family Test;.ResultsAt discharge, 6 and 12 months follow ups, there were improvements from baseline that were greater than minimum clinically important differences in each of the outcomes (with the sole exception of ODI at discharge). At 12 months, the majority of people considered themselves a lot better (57%) and were extremely likely (86%) to recommend the programme to a friend. The qualitative data showed praise for the residential nature of the intervention and the opportunities for interaction with peers and peer support. There were testimonies of improvements in understanding of pain and how to manage it better. Some participants said they had reduced, or stopped, medication they had been taking to manage their pain.ConclusionsParticipants improved, and maintained long term, beyond minimum clinically important differences on a wide range of outcomes. Participants reported an enhanced ability to self-manage their back pain and support for the residential setting.

Development of a Minimum Reporting Set of Contextual Factors for Rehabilitation Studies: A Delphi Study

“…and infectious diseases, including COVID-19 (both acute and long-term care) (1, 2). The implementation of rehabilitation interventions, such as other health strategies and health interventions, should be evidence based; in other words, they should be based on the results of clinical trials.Clinical trials in rehabilitation have emerged during the last 3 decades, due to its relevance for almost every health condition, such as cancer (3-6), stroke (7-10), traumatic brain injury and other neurological disorders (11-13), musculoskeletal pain (17,18), and diabetes (19). Studies on rehabilitation services have been performed in different care settings, including hospitals and community (20).…”

“…Clinical trials in rehabilitation have emerged during the last 3 decades, due to its relevance for almost every health condition, such as cancer (3-6), stroke (7-10), traumatic brain injury and other neurological disorders (11-13), musculoskeletal pain (17,18), and diabetes (19). Studies on rehabilitation services have been performed in different care settings, including hospitals and community (20).…”