2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term in vivo operation of implanted cardiac nanogenerators in swine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interdigital electrode was affected by electrostatic induction, and the induced current was generated in the circuit. [ 16 ]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interdigital electrode was affected by electrostatic induction, and the induced current was generated in the circuit. [ 16 ]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-powered sensors with low or zero power consumption and high performance for monitoring physiological signals (e.g., for active endocardial monitoring) will make strengths in real-time medical monitoring. Li et al evaluated the safety of a soft and flexible implantable nanogenerators (i-NG) system for long-term in vivo cardiac implantation [ 68 ]. The system consisted of piezoelectric PVDF-based i-NG, leads, and receivers were implanted into the epicardial membrane of pigs for two months.…”
Section: Biomechanical Monitoring In the Cardiovascular Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [ 68 ]. ( B ) Schematic diagram of the mechanism for monitoring blood flow velocity by iTEAS.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, biomedical energy harvesters, especially bio-implantable energy harvesters, are required to be biocompatible, which necessitates biocompatible device components including piezoelectric material, electrode, substrate, and encapsulation [ 75 ]. For piezoelectric biomedical energy harvesters, electrode materials have been reported including Cr [ 76 ], Ag [ 77 ], Cu [ 78 ], Au [ 76 ], Al [ 79 ], graphene [ 80 ], and indium tin oxide (ITO) [ 81 ], substrate materials have been reported including plastic films (e.g., polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [ 82 , 83 ], and polyimide(PI) [ 84 ]) and metallic foils (e.g., Ni [ 85 ], Pt [ 86 ], and Ni–Cr alloy [ 87 ]), and encapsulation materials have been reported such as PI [ 84 ], PDMS [ 88 ], and PDMS/Parylene-C [ 89 ]. Initial studies have confirmed their biosafety [ 76 , 89 ], but long-term biocompatibility studies using large animal models or clinical studies are highly desired to conclude on their long-term biocompatibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For piezoelectric biomedical energy harvesters, electrode materials have been reported including Cr [ 76 ], Ag [ 77 ], Cu [ 78 ], Au [ 76 ], Al [ 79 ], graphene [ 80 ], and indium tin oxide (ITO) [ 81 ], substrate materials have been reported including plastic films (e.g., polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [ 82 , 83 ], and polyimide(PI) [ 84 ]) and metallic foils (e.g., Ni [ 85 ], Pt [ 86 ], and Ni–Cr alloy [ 87 ]), and encapsulation materials have been reported such as PI [ 84 ], PDMS [ 88 ], and PDMS/Parylene-C [ 89 ]. Initial studies have confirmed their biosafety [ 76 , 89 ], but long-term biocompatibility studies using large animal models or clinical studies are highly desired to conclude on their long-term biocompatibility. In terms of piezoelectric material, high-performance lead-free piezoelectric ceramics [ 90 , 91 ] and piezoelectric polymers [ 2 ] have been widely reported to be biocompatible, while lead-based ceramics may also be biocompatible in the crystalline state [ 92 ] or under proper encapsulation [ 84 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%