2006
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.43.206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Integrity of Waste Package Final Closure for HLW Geological Disposal, (III) Applicability of Electron Beam Welding to Overpack Final Closure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MAG and EBW cannot be compared because the efficiency of EBW is higher for thick plate welding, at 10 min for 100 mm and 26 min for 190 mm in the full penetration/ circumferential welding of a full-scale overpack lid structure, 7) which corresponds to working efficiencies that are approximately 9.0 and 5.5 times higher than that of MAG.…”
Section: Comparison With Tig and Ebw Test Results (1) Welding Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…MAG and EBW cannot be compared because the efficiency of EBW is higher for thick plate welding, at 10 min for 100 mm and 26 min for 190 mm in the full penetration/ circumferential welding of a full-scale overpack lid structure, 7) which corresponds to working efficiencies that are approximately 9.0 and 5.5 times higher than that of MAG.…”
Section: Comparison With Tig and Ebw Test Results (1) Welding Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) Although heat input conditions were identified as a potential solution to manage these weld flaws, this has not been examined yet. 7) In the case of MAG, slag inclusion generation is seen and these inclusions are randomly scattered, even if slag removal is conducted. There are two sides to the issue of weld flaw presence, as stated in our first report.…”
Section: Comparison With Tig and Ebw Test Results (1) Welding Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this series of studies, a structural integrity evaluation model of the lid closure based on the fracture mechanics assessment was proposed. [2][3][4][5][6][7] This evaluation method refers to the fitness for service (FFS) assessment of nuclear power plant components, an assessment method specified for the overpack, which takes into consideration the technical limitations caused by emplacement of the overpack in a deep underground geological formation. It is intended to assure the structural integrity of the weld joint for 1000 years without any inspection or repair of the overpack after it is emplaced in a repository.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%