2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09091-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term investigation of environmental radioactivity levels and public health around the Qinshan Nuclear Power Plant, China

Abstract: To evaluate the impact of the Qinshan Nuclear Power Plant (Qinshan NPP) in normal operation on the surrounding environment and population, the radioactivity levels of drinking water and the ambient environment, as well as the residents’ cancer incidence, were continuously monitored for a period of 9 years (2012–2020). All of the gross α and β radioactivity concentrations in drinking water were less than the WHO recommended values (0.5 Bq/L for gross α and 1 Bq/L for gross β). The results of ambient environment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the reported gross α and β radioactivity concentrations in tap waters collected from the surroundings of NPPs in other six provinces (Jiangsu, Shandong, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, and Liaoning) in China, the levels of gross α and gross β radioactivity in Sanmen tap water were relatively low (see Table 3 ) ( 30 ). The result of this study is consistent with the survey of the Qinshan NPP from 2012 to 2020 ( 31 ), confirming the drinking water gross α and gross β radioactivity in Zhejiang Province is still at the background level.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the reported gross α and β radioactivity concentrations in tap waters collected from the surroundings of NPPs in other six provinces (Jiangsu, Shandong, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, and Liaoning) in China, the levels of gross α and gross β radioactivity in Sanmen tap water were relatively low (see Table 3 ) ( 30 ). The result of this study is consistent with the survey of the Qinshan NPP from 2012 to 2020 ( 31 ), confirming the drinking water gross α and gross β radioactivity in Zhejiang Province is still at the background level.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As shown in Table 10 , for all cancers combined, a total of 815 new cases were recorded for the residents around SNPP from 2014 to 2021, with a crude incidence of 428.22/100,000, including 438.73/100,000 in males and 416.68/100,000 in females, respectively. This consistent with the incidence rate of inhabitants living around Qinshan NPP ( 31 ). The ASIRC of both sexes range from 378.80/100,000 to 498.04/100,000, and the ASIRW of both sexes range from 247.08/100,000 to 302.80/100,000.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, workers in a number of occupations such as medical professionals, miners (particularly uranium miners), nuclear power plant workers, and aircrew members, are exposed to IR (CAREX Canada 2021 ). Exposures are also received by those who reside near nuclear power plants, although these exposures are generally regarded as being low (Cao et al 2022 ; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural radioactive gases, such as the isotopes of radon ( 222 Rn and 220 Rn) and the anthropogenic radionuclides coming from fission products (Xe and 85 Kr isotopes) and activation products ( 3 H and 37 Ar), need to be carefully monitored. For example, isotopes such as 85 Kr and 3 H, which originate from nuclear power plants, reprocessing plants and nuclear waste treatments, [1][2][3][4][5] are critical to detect for monitoring nuclear activity and providing feedback to the national or international authorities to evaluate the nuclear environmental impact. Precise detection of 85 Kr variation concentration in air can also play a crucial role in detecting illegal reprocessing of nuclear fuel to produce plutonium for weapons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%