2008
DOI: 10.1089/jop.2008.0033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term IOP Lowering With Bimatoprost in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients Poorly Responsive to Latanoprost

Abstract: Significant additional long-term IOP lowering may be achieved by switching to bimatoprost in patients with open-angle glaucoma who are not at target IOP with latanoprost.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Kammer and colleagues found an additional 1.9 mmHg and 2.1 mmHg mean diurnal IOP reduction from latanoprost mono-treated baseline in glaucoma or OHT patients after 1 and 3 months of bimatoprost 0.03% monotherapy replacement, respectively, and this IOP-lowering efficacy was significantly stronger when compared with switching to travoprost monotherapy [14]. Data from a 24-month study of OAG patients also demonstrated a 15.0–24.0% additional reduction in IOP after changing latanoprost to bimatoprost as monotherapy or in multi-therapy, before adding a further adjunctive agent [30]. Together these results suggest that bimatoprost may provide better IOP control than PGs, which may be attributed in part to its ocular distribution to outflow tissues and dual outflow mechanism following topical administration [9,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Kammer and colleagues found an additional 1.9 mmHg and 2.1 mmHg mean diurnal IOP reduction from latanoprost mono-treated baseline in glaucoma or OHT patients after 1 and 3 months of bimatoprost 0.03% monotherapy replacement, respectively, and this IOP-lowering efficacy was significantly stronger when compared with switching to travoprost monotherapy [14]. Data from a 24-month study of OAG patients also demonstrated a 15.0–24.0% additional reduction in IOP after changing latanoprost to bimatoprost as monotherapy or in multi-therapy, before adding a further adjunctive agent [30]. Together these results suggest that bimatoprost may provide better IOP control than PGs, which may be attributed in part to its ocular distribution to outflow tissues and dual outflow mechanism following topical administration [9,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prescreening the monkeys for strong responsiveness to PGF 2α -ie may have eliminated some variability in IOP efficacies as reported in humans where nonresponders to latanoprost may still respond to bimatoprost. ((17-19))…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,23 Mean IOP before the switch to bimatoprost, however, was approximately 23 mm Hg in their study. 14,23 Our study suggests that the decrease of IOP also occurred with switching to bimatoprost in Japanese patients who are insufficient responders to latanoprost even though pretreatment IOP is low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%