2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-019-04168-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Matched Comparison of Adjustable Gastric Banding Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy: Weight Loss, Quality of Life, Hospital Resource Use and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the popularity of LAGB has been declining rapidly in the past years due to high rates of ineffective weight loss and frequent re-operations [3], the technical ease of the procedure, the low early postoperative complications, and the short length of hospitalization [3] could make it a feasible option in a selected group of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the popularity of LAGB has been declining rapidly in the past years due to high rates of ineffective weight loss and frequent re-operations [3], the technical ease of the procedure, the low early postoperative complications, and the short length of hospitalization [3] could make it a feasible option in a selected group of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This small volume of food was thought to stretch the stomach and cause early satiety. Gradual emptying of the proximal pouch into the infra-band stomach is thought to be responsible for prolonged inter-meal satiety [3]. More recently, it has been hypothesized that LAGB mechanism of action includes the induction of early and prolonged satiety; however, the intraluminal events that lead to this are far more complex than simple retention of food in the proximal pouch and merit further evaluation beyond the scope of this manuscript [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unfortunately, post-op PA/ diet were not included in the analysis, despite that EWL was an examined outcome [32]. Another long-term matched comparison of adjustable gastric banding vs sleeve gastrectomy (matching criteria: age, weight, surgery date) did not include post-op PA/diet in the analysis, despite that mean total body WL was an examined outcome [6]. Likewise, research compared the efficacy of primary vs revisional laparoscopic RYGB using matched analysis (matching criteria: age, gender, preoperative BMI, follow-up period), but post-op PA/diet were not included in the analysis, despite that WL was an examined outcome [33].…”
Section: Examples Of Non-inclusion Of Post-op Pa and Diet In Comparismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, it is not clear why patients' post-op PA and dietary practices are not considered in such analyses. There have been calls for the comprehensive measurement of outcomes in BS [6]. However, unless there is a general belief or consensus that, post-BS, all patients are considered equal in terms of their PA and/or diet practices, comparisons of short-, medium-, or long-term effectiveness of various BS procedures, and comparisons of effectiveness of BS vs no surgery are likely to remain a reflection of the effectiveness of a given procedure, probably contaminated with the consequences of the patients' quality and extent of post-op PA/diet.…”
Section: Conclusion: Now What?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation