Long-term measurements (2010–2014) of carbonaceous aerosol and carbon monoxide at the Zotino Tall Tower Observatory (ZOTTO) in central Siberia

Abstract

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> We present long-term (5-year) measurements of particulate matter (PM<sub>10</sub>), elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), and water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) in aerosol filter samples with an upper limit of ~ 10 µm collected at the Zotino Tall Tower Observatory in the middle-taiga subzone (Siberia). The data are complemented with carbon monoxide (CO) measurements. Air mass back trajectory analysis and satellite image analysis were used to characterize potential source regions and the transport pathway of haze plumes. Polluted and background periods were selected using a non-parametric statistical approach and analyzed separately. In addition, near-pristine air masses were selected based on their EC concentrations being below the detection limit of our thermal/optical instrument. Over the entire sampling campaign, 75 % and 48 % of air masses in winter and in summer, respectively, and 42 % in spring and fall are classified as polluted. In the winter season, pollution plumes originated mainly from the big industrialized cities to the south and southwest of the site. During the winter pollution events, the pollution concentration enhancements (Δ values) ratios ∆OC / ∆EC and ∆EC / ∆CO are 3.9 ± 0.6 and 5.8 ± 0.7 ng m<sup>−3</sup> ppb<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, suggesting that the contribution of coal and other fossil fuel burning for heating was dominant. In summertime, pollution plumes arrived at the ZOTTO site from nearby large-scale boreal wildfires, which were observed during the three years from 2011 to 2013. As a result, the seasonal concentrations of CO, PM<sub>10</sub>, and OC were as high as 670 ± 710 ppb, 59 ± 53 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, and 26 ± 27 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively, with ∆OC / ∆EC of 26.2 ± 0.1 and ∆EC / ∆CO of 1.3 ± 0.1 ng m<sup>−3</sup> ppb<sup>−1</sup>. Agricultural fires from the steppe zone of southern Siberia and northern Kazakhstan also accounted for elevated concentrations of CO and carbonaceous species. For one extreme pollution episode observed on 28 April 2010 the CO, PM<sub>10</sub>, EC, and OC concentrations were as high as 261 ± 12 ppb, 54.4 ± 3.7, 1.5 ± 0.3, and 18.9 ± 1.2 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively, with ∆OC / ∆EC = 12.7 ± 2.7 and ∆EC / ∆CO = 14.3 ± 4.4 ng m<sup>−3</sup> ppb<sup>−1</sup>. The observed background concentrations of CO and EC showed a sine-like behavior with a period of 365 ± 4 days, with maximum values in winter of 151 ± 20 ppb and 0.08 ± 0.03 µg m<sup>−3</sup> and minimum values in summer of 114 ± 15 ppb and 0.03 ± 0.02 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively. The observed background concentrations are mostly due to different degrees of dilution and removal of polluted air masses arriving at ZOTTO from remote sources. Our analysis of the near-pristine conditions shows that the longest periods with clean air masses were observed in summer, with a frequency of 17 %, while in wintertime only 1 % can be classified as a clean. In summer, variations in the OC / PM ratio during clean periods closely correlated with those in air temperature, which indicates that biogenic sources of OC formation were dominating. Against a background of low concentrations of CO, EC, and OC in the near-pristine summertime it was possible to identify pollution plumes that most likely came from crude oil production sites located in the oil-rich regions of Western Siberia. Overall, our analysis indicates that most of the time the Siberian region is impacted by atmospheric pollution arising from biomass burning and anthropogenic emissions. A relatively clean atmosphere can be observed mainly in summer, when polluted species are removed by precipitation and the aerosol burden returns to near-pristine conditions.</p>

Estimation of the Elemental to Organic Carbon Ratio in Biomass Burning Aerosol Using AERONET Retrievals

“…Our estimates of the EC/OC mass ratio range from 0.015-0.077, with the mean value of 0.036 (±0.009). The estimated mean value of the EC/OC ratio is found to be significantly smaller than the corresponding value (0.06) predicted by the BB aerosol simulations based on the emission factors specified in the GFED4 emission inventory, but in a very good agreement with the recently reported [74] value of the EC/OC enhancement ratio (0.038) evaluated in long-term in situ measurements of carbonaceous aerosol at the Zotino tall tower observatory. Our estimates indicate that the EC/OC mass ratio tends to increase with the photochemical age of BB aerosol, although the statistical significance of the tendency is rather low.…”

“…Values of our best (Case 1) estimates range from 0.015-0.077, with the mean value of 0.036. It is useful to note that this value is in a very good agreement with the recently reported [74] value of EC/OC enhancement ratio (0.038) evaluated for BB aerosol in Siberia using the long-term in situ measurements of carbonaceous aerosol at the Zotino tall tower observatory (ZOTTO). Taking into account the uncertainties of the fits involved in the estimation procedures, one can see that the base case estimates almost perfectly agree with the Also shown are (a,b) the corresponding AOD data from the two CHIMERE runs, "fire" and "bgr", made with and without fire emissions, respectively, and (c,d) the ambient relative humidity (RH) in the BB aerosol columns.…”

Black and brown carbon over central Amazonia: Long-term aerosol measurements at the ATTO site

“…Enhancement ratios (ER BC ) for open biomass burning measured for boreal forest smoldering fires have an average ER BC of 1.7 ng m -3 ppb -1 (Kondo et al, 2011). On the other hand, agricultural fires exhibit higher ER BC compared to forest fires, with reported values varying between 2.2 and 29.8 ng m -3 ppb -1 , see Mikhailov et al (2017) and references therein.…”

Unifying atmospheric biology research for the U.S. scientific community

“…Related terminology, as indicated by a Web of Science search, includes bioaerosols (n = 737), airborne life (n = 569), aerobiology (n = 235), or airborne organisms (n = 199). Whether traced by aircraft, alpine observatories, or stationary tall towers such as WLEF, ATTO, and ZOTTO (e.g., Jaenicke 2005, Mikhailov et al 2017, we now know bioaerosols can be scattered by global circulating winds and thus subject to long-range intercontinental transport , Tellier et al 2019. This means that atmospheric aerosols and their biotic load flow across national borders , Yang et al 2015), depositing contagion, allergens, and pollutants inside closed spaces whether residential, ocean shipping, aviation, or aerospace (Gregory 1961, Hammond et al 1989, Osman et al 2008, Yang et al 2011.…”

“…Related terminology, as indicated by a Web of Science search, includes bioaerosols ( n = 737), airborne life ( n = 569), aerobiology ( n = 235), or airborne organisms ( n = 199). Whether traced by aircraft, alpine observatories, or stationary tall towers such as WLEF, ATTO, and ZOTTO (e.g., Jaenicke 2005, Smith et al 2013, Mikhailov et al 2017, Figs. 2 and 3), we now know bioaerosols can be scattered by global circulating winds and thus subject to long‐range intercontinental transport (Smith et al 2013, Tellier et al 2019).…”