2009
DOI: 10.1002/art.24545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term medical costs and resource utilization in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: A five‐year analysis of a large medicaid population

Abstract: Objective. To estimate the long-term direct medical costs and health care utilization for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and a subset of SLE patients with nephritis. Methods. Patients with newly active SLE were found in the MarketScan Medicaid Database (1999 -2005), which includes all inpatient, outpatient, emergency department, and pharmaceutical claims for more than 10 million Medicaid beneficiaries. The date a patient became newly active was defined as the earliest observed SLE diagnosis c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
174
4
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
174
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al reported that SLE patients with nephritis incurred annual costs $13,228 -$34,907 greater than control patients. Similar to the findings reported by Pelletier et al, inpatient visits for nephritis patients were 0.6 -1.0 per capita, approximately twice the rate for all SLE patients and nearly 4 times higher than the reference group (21,27). Patients with nephritis who did not progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) over the 5-year study period generated costs similar to the overall SLE population in the first 3 years; however, costs increased in years 4 and 5 to 46 -61% greater than the overall SLE group.…”
Section: Slawsky Et Alsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Li et al reported that SLE patients with nephritis incurred annual costs $13,228 -$34,907 greater than control patients. Similar to the findings reported by Pelletier et al, inpatient visits for nephritis patients were 0.6 -1.0 per capita, approximately twice the rate for all SLE patients and nearly 4 times higher than the reference group (21,27). Patients with nephritis who did not progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) over the 5-year study period generated costs similar to the overall SLE population in the first 3 years; however, costs increased in years 4 and 5 to 46 -61% greater than the overall SLE group.…”
Section: Slawsky Et Alsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Four relevant populations were examined: 1) SLE patients in general (including those both with and without nephritis, as well as other disease manifestations and comorbidities), 2) SLE patients with nephritis, 3) SLE patients without nephritis, and 4) matched controls (propensity score matched on key demographic variables). Several studies examined more than 1 population subgroup, although only 2 articles reported cost information for all 4 subgroups (Li et al, 2009 [21], and Carls et al, 2009 [16]), and both studies were based on retrospective claims analyses that used propensity score matching in order to define the reference (control) group. No disease manifestations other than nephritis were explicitly studied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations