2010
DOI: 10.1521/psyc.2010.73.4.352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Military Work Outcomes in Soldiers Who Become Mental Health Casualties When Deployed on Operations

Abstract: the results of this study support the use of the Forward Psychiatry principles in achieving good short-term military work outcomes. Utilizing these principles, three-quarters of those referred to the FMHT were returned to their deployed unit and approximately three-quarters of those assessed by the FMHT remained in service two years after referral. We suggest that these are positive work outcomes; however, being evacuated out of the operational environment and having a short service length were both associated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fits with the UK military’s policy on treating psychiatric injuries known as ‘forward psychiatry’; that is, to treat them within the proximity of where the event is presented, to deliver care immediately and with the expectancy of occupational recovery [24]. By avoiding evacuation too readily and keeping personnel with their unit, evidence suggests that psychiatric problems are less likely to develop [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This fits with the UK military’s policy on treating psychiatric injuries known as ‘forward psychiatry’; that is, to treat them within the proximity of where the event is presented, to deliver care immediately and with the expectancy of occupational recovery [24]. By avoiding evacuation too readily and keeping personnel with their unit, evidence suggests that psychiatric problems are less likely to develop [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This is in line with the approach adopted after potentially critical incidents (see above), since it means treating distressed personnel as quickly as possible, as close to the frontline as possible, and in many cases persuading them that their reactions area normal physiological response to the stress of battle, and that after a few days of rest, sleep, clean clothes, and hot food, he/she will be able to resume his/her military duties. This approach was substantiated by evidence showing that soldiers receiving treatment in a forward unit have lower rates of PTSD and other psychiatric symptoms, experienced less loneliness and report better social functioning compared to similarly traumatized soldiers treated in rear units (Jones, Fear, Jones, Wessely, & Greenberg, 2010; Solomon, Mikulincer, & Waysman, 1991; Solomon, Mikulincer, Waysman, & Marlowe, 1991; Solomon, Shklar, & Mikulincer, 2005). The “forward psychiatry” approach has gradually been replaced with “embedded mental health” that is organic to the unit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Research on factors influencing outcome among those with mental disorders is sparse. Associations have been seen with diagnosis, 17 23 illness severity, 23 24 years of service, 17 23 24 combat occupation, 17 24 rank, 17 23 24 gender, 17 24 age, 24 marital status, 24 presence of comorbid conditions 17 and treatment, 17 factors that are mostly non-modifiable.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%