2015
DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term mortality of patients surviving firearm violence

Abstract: Among individuals presenting to the ED after injury or assault and surviving to discharge, firearm injury exposure is an important predictor of death within 5 years and most pronounced in the first year after injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with those of two recent cohort studies that reported increased all‐cause and firearm‐related mortality among both firearm injury (AHR = 2.54 and 4.3, 95% CI = 1.41–4.59 and 1.3–14.1, respectively) and NFA survivors (AHR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.01–2.68) compared to accidentally injured and noninjured patients, further expanding this understanding of long‐term risk to include the pediatric population. In the recent investigation by Fahimi et al., nonfatal firearm injury and NFA both carried a 5% risk of death at 5 years; our study further underscores that children and adolescents who are seen in urban trauma centers for either FA or NFA may both be at similarly high risk for mortality over time. However, while most deaths in the former study's surviving firearm injury cohort occurred in the first year after index injury, the median time to death among FA and NFA subjects in the present study was 4.6 and 5.3 years, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings are consistent with those of two recent cohort studies that reported increased all‐cause and firearm‐related mortality among both firearm injury (AHR = 2.54 and 4.3, 95% CI = 1.41–4.59 and 1.3–14.1, respectively) and NFA survivors (AHR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.01–2.68) compared to accidentally injured and noninjured patients, further expanding this understanding of long‐term risk to include the pediatric population. In the recent investigation by Fahimi et al., nonfatal firearm injury and NFA both carried a 5% risk of death at 5 years; our study further underscores that children and adolescents who are seen in urban trauma centers for either FA or NFA may both be at similarly high risk for mortality over time. However, while most deaths in the former study's surviving firearm injury cohort occurred in the first year after index injury, the median time to death among FA and NFA subjects in the present study was 4.6 and 5.3 years, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For example, in one prospective cohort of assault‐exposed youth aged 14 to 24 years, 59% experienced subsequent exposure to gun violence (either aggression or victimization) within 2 years of their initial ED visit . In contrast with their influence on short‐term mortality, clinical and injury‐specific covariates were not significant predictors of long‐term mortality in our sample and, therefore, medical complications of more severe injuries were unlikely to play an important role in conveying this increased risk. On the other hand, given that falling victim to firearm or NFA often reflects community‐level violence, we hypothesize that community‐level factors associated with firearm injury and homicide may play a more important role in long‐term mortality risk than the individual‐level factors examined in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, studies have shown elevated mortality risk after recovery from firearm injury, which may have lowered our measured recurrence rate. 4,5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Recurrent injury is a promising target for prevention, as prior injury is a predictor of future violent injury 3 and death. 46 Hospital-based violence intervention programs show promising results with in reducing re-injury and costs by using an initial injury visit to initiate prevention, 7,8 but appropriately scaling and distributing violence prevention resources requires a more accurate understanding of the incidence, risk factors, and impact of recurrent violent injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%