2008
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2008.33650009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LONG-TERM ORIENTATION IN FAMILY FIRMS: A BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF R&D SPENDING.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An earlier version of the paper won the Best Family Business Paper Award at the Academy of Management Meetings (2008) and was selected as the FBN Best Family Business Research Paper at the annual meeting of the international family enterprise research academy (IFERA). An earlier version of the paper also appeared in the Best Paper Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (2008) (Block and Thams, 2008).…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An earlier version of the paper won the Best Family Business Paper Award at the Academy of Management Meetings (2008) and was selected as the FBN Best Family Business Research Paper at the annual meeting of the international family enterprise research academy (IFERA). An earlier version of the paper also appeared in the Best Paper Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (2008) (Block and Thams, 2008).…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this section, we will summarize some of the few papers. Using data on R&D spending as a proxy for long-term orientation, Block and Thams (2007) found only a few differences between family and non-family firms in general. When using a sub-sample of family firms only, however, they found that family management is positively related to a higher level of R&D spending, whereas family ownership seems to have a negative impact on R&D spending.…”
Section: Extant Empirical Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lagrange multiplier Breusch-Pagan test was used to choose between the pooled method and the random effect models [85]. The null hypothesis that the variance of random effects was zero and the alternative hypothesis that it was not zero were as follows:…”
Section: 0007mentioning
confidence: 99%