2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcome after urinary diversion using the ileocecal segment in children and adolescents: Complications of the efferent segment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bladder perforation, as one of the worst complications, occurred in 6% to 13% . Continent cutaneous catheterizable channels have been shown to have a relatively high revision rate due to stenosis or incontinence of the stoma (up to 50‐60%), depending on the type of channel …”
Section: Procedures To Increase Bladder Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bladder perforation, as one of the worst complications, occurred in 6% to 13% . Continent cutaneous catheterizable channels have been shown to have a relatively high revision rate due to stenosis or incontinence of the stoma (up to 50‐60%), depending on the type of channel …”
Section: Procedures To Increase Bladder Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Continent cutaneous catheterizable channels have been shown to have a relatively high revision rate due to stenosis or incontinence of the stoma (up to 50-60%), depending on the type of channel. 16,17 In addition to surgical complications the metabolic consequences of incorporating bowel segments into the urinary tract have to be taken into account; for example, disturbances of the acid-base balance, vitamin B 12 deficiency and loss of bone density. Stool frequency may increase and diarrhea can occur after the exclusion of bowel segments.…”
Section: Bladder Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus on the definition of incontinence in this population. Some authors have used total absence of involuntary loss of urine day and night between catheterizations ( 13 , 15 ). Most publications however, have considered patients socially continent if they were completely dry or used 1 safety pad between catheterizations every 3 hours.…”
Section: Management Of Common Channel Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stomal stenosis, channel angulation, channel redundancy, channel diverticulum/false passage as well as incontinence as described above are common reasons for revision. In most contemporary published reports, over 90% of CCCs with complications are salvageable with a variety of revision operations ( 11 , 12 , 15 ).…”
Section: Management Of Common Channel Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Hauptkomplikationen von Stomata katheterisierbarer Pouches sind die Stomastenosen und die Stomainsuffizienz mit Inkontinenz. Zum Vergleich unserer Ergebnisse greifen wir auf zwei Studien mit hoher Fallzahl (n = 800 und n = 107) zurück [8,9]. Wiesner et al berichten über Stenoseraten von 23,5 % für den Appendixnippel und 15,3 % für den invaginierten Ileumnippel bei einer mittleren Nachbeobachtungszeit von 7,6 Jahren [8].…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified