Abstract:Key Points• Efficacy of imatinib in steroidrefractory chronic GVHD was prospectively compared across 3 different response systems, with high agreement.• Validity of quantitative-based assessment of response with NIH criteria was confirmed by its prognostic impact on longterm survival.Forty adults aged 28 to 73 years were entered into a prospective trial of imatinib for the treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (SR-cGVHD). After 6 months, intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis of 39 patie… Show more
“…The only therapeutic intervention study published thus far, which strictly applied NIH criteria, was in a cohort of 39 steroid-refractory patients. 7 The results of that study suggested the NIH overall response calculation change was predictive for survival, and a significant correlation between the NIH overall response calculation and the 4-point Courriel clinicianassessed response scale was found. Baird et al 8 have shown that NIH organ and global severity scores are valid measures of cGVHD disease burden, and that the NIH lung score is the strongest predictor of survival outcomes.…”
“…The only therapeutic intervention study published thus far, which strictly applied NIH criteria, was in a cohort of 39 steroid-refractory patients. 7 The results of that study suggested the NIH overall response calculation change was predictive for survival, and a significant correlation between the NIH overall response calculation and the 4-point Courriel clinicianassessed response scale was found. Baird et al 8 have shown that NIH organ and global severity scores are valid measures of cGVHD disease burden, and that the NIH lung score is the strongest predictor of survival outcomes.…”
“…Furthermore, the previous studies determined response rates at 3 and 6 months after initiation of imatinib treatment. 6,7 Our second patient (case 2) has achieved long-time survival with ultimate stabilization of FEV 1 , even though he did not appear to show improvement 6 months after initiation of imatinib. To the best of our knowledge, there have not been any published cases of cGVHD where the patient received continuous TKI therapy over a 10-year period and achieved long-term survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…4 Several studies have shown that imatinib can ameliorate chronic GVHD (cGVHD). [5][6][7] However, there are few published reports of studies that have focused on the efficacy of TKIs used to treat BO associated with cGVHD. Here, we describe two patients who had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and developed biopsy-proven BO that was successfully treated with TKIs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, there have not been any published cases of cGVHD where the patient received continuous TKI therapy over a 10-year period and achieved long-term survival. Although 1-4 months of imatinib treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe pulmonary cGVHD has shown limited efficacy, 10 the response rate was improved when imatinib treatment was planned for at least 6 months, 7 suggesting that a longer duration of therapy may be more effective. In the absence of toxicity or intolerance, prolonged imatinib treatment may be beneficial for the treatment of BO.…”
“…In the two cases, imatinib treatment stabilized the patients' pulmonary function and prolonged their survival time. Several studies have also described the efficacy of imatinib in the treatment of BO in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (10)(11)(12). In the rat BO model of heterotopic tracheal transplantation (HTT), imatinib inhibited the tracheal luminal occlusion 30 days after transplantation compared with vehicle-treated allografts (13,14).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.