Purpose
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can cure some chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) subjects. This study compared outcomes of myeloablative (MA) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) transplants from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD) for CLL.
Patients and Methods
From 1995–2007 there were 297 CLL subjects reported to the CIBMTR who received MA (N=163) and RIC (N=134) MSD HCT. The MA subjects were less often transplanted after 2000 and less commonly received anti-thymocyte globulin (4% vs. 13%, p=0.004) or prior antibody therapy (14% vs. 53%; p<0.001).
Results
RIC was associated with a greater likelihood of platelet recovery and less grade 2–4 acute GvHD compared to MA conditioning. 1 and 5-year treatment related mortality (TRM) were 24% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 16–33%) vs. 37% (95% CI, 30–45%; p=0.023), and 40% (95% CI, 29–51%) vs. 54% (95% CI, 46–62%; p=0.036), and the relapse/progression rates were 21% (95% CI, 14–29%) vs. 10% (95% CI, 6–15%; p=0.020), and 35% (95% CI, 26–46%) vs. 17% (95% CI, 12–24%; p=0.003). MA conditioning was associated with better progression-free (PFS) (relative risk (RR) 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37–0.97, p=0.038) and 3-year survival in transplants before 2001, but for subsequent years RIC was associated with better PFS and survival (RR 1.49 (95% CI, 0.92–2.42), p=0.10; and RR 1.86 (95% CI, 1.11–3.13), p=0.019). Pre-transplant disease status was the most important predictor of relapse (p=0.003) and PFS (p=0.0007) for both forms of transplant conditioning.
Conclusion
MA and RIC MSD transplants are effective for CLL. Future strategies to decrease TRM and reduce relapses are warranted.