2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02490.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcome of ATG vs. Basiliximab induction

Abstract: ATG induction was associated with an improved (but n.s.) trend in patient and graft survival. Patients induced with ATG had a higher rate of CMV infections and haematological complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chapal et al also found five explicative variables that contributed significantly to DGF prediction, and demonstrated that risk of DGF was reduced 1.73-fold in patients with ATG [6]. Other studies also demonstrated significantly lower rates of DGF in ATG-induced DCD recipients [24][25][26]. Our results demonstrated that ATG as induction therapy in DBCD donation could reduce the risk of DGF by more than half.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Chapal et al also found five explicative variables that contributed significantly to DGF prediction, and demonstrated that risk of DGF was reduced 1.73-fold in patients with ATG [6]. Other studies also demonstrated significantly lower rates of DGF in ATG-induced DCD recipients [24][25][26]. Our results demonstrated that ATG as induction therapy in DBCD donation could reduce the risk of DGF by more than half.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Basiliximab had low acute rejection rates similar to those achieved by rATG; however, it had a better safety profile, with no increase in malignancies, infections, or deaths [29] . Another study showed that the 6-year patient and graft survival in the rATG group was not significantly higher than that compared to basiliximab (91.7 vs. 85% and 89.7 vs. 83.6%, respectively); however, cytomegalovirus infections were more prevalent in the rATG group (22 vs. 5%, p = 0.05) and so was the incidence of hematological complications [30] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27] In solid organ transplantation, ATG treatment effectively prevents rejection and is used as induction therapy and as for overcoming acute rejection episodes. 25,28 In this experiment, ATG donor preconditioning was able to reduce BD-triggered inflammation in donors and recipients in a clinically applicable setting.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 95%