A clear cause and cure for Crohn's disease (CD) continues to elude caregivers and researchers alike, much to the frustration of these frequently youthful and usually very symptomatic patients. The experienced clinician recognizes that he or she is frequently treating only the complications of CD and not the disease itself. Thus, drugs are used to quell mucosal inflammation and to treat foci of sepsis (fistuli and abscesses) without knowing what is actually causing the inflammation or abscesses.One of the most symptomatic of CD complications is intestinal obstruction brought about by either severe inflammation compromising the lumen of the bowel or a fibrotic stricture, the result of "burnt out" inflammation and scarring. Such bowel obstruction can present as an acute emergency but more often is manifest as recurrent, crampy abdominal pain aggravated by oral intake, especially of high-fiber foods. Twenty percent of CD patients will have small bowel strictures, usually near the terminal ileum, while about another 10% will have colonic strictures. 1 Such symptomatic strictures, when inflammatory, should be treated with appropriate antiinflammatory medications. When nonresponsive to medical management or when fixed and fibrotic, surgical resection and anastomosis can provide dramatic relief, especially in the case of ileocolic disease. However, such surgery will commonly be followed by recurrence of disease, initially inflammatory, subsequently fibrotic, precipitating the need for recurrent surgery in Ϸ50% of patients at 10 years. 2-4 Such recurrence is more a failure of effective medical management than it is of surgery. Regardless, this repetitive cycle of relapsing inflammation, stricturing, and the need for surgical resection can potentially result in short gut with the associated cumulative risk of numerous surgical procedures. In this context the concept of a nonsurgical endoscopic technique to relieve the obstructive symptoms of intestinal stricturing has intuitive appeal. Unfortunately, this attractive first impression must be tempered with some of the realistic problems associated with the technique.
SUMMARY OF TECHNIQUE AND OUTCOMESThe technique of endoscopic balloon dilatation is widely variable, based largely on the preference and experience of the endoscopist. 5 Obviously, the stricture must be reachable, so most are either colonic or ileocolic and not infrequently an anastomotic stricture after previous operative ileocolectomy. Some clinicians dilate using balloon diameters to as large at 25 mm 3 , but most will dilate only to 18 or 20 mm, citing a lower complication rate. Insufflation is usually held for several (1-4) minutes, and then the balloon is deflated and the process repeated several times until an adequate lumen is appreciated visually. Sometimes successful dilatation is defined by the subsequent passage of the colonoscope (about 13 mm in diameter) through the stricture, but this is inconsistent in the literature and not necessarily associated with a higher symptomatic relief rate. Frequently,...