2006
DOI: 10.1385/ncc:5:3:235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Outcome of Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Abstract: Background: The long-term follow-up system for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is not well established worldwide. In our study, the preliminary data of the long-term prognosis of GBS are collected to explore the prognosis of GBS and the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment. Methods: The follow-up data of 186 patients with GBS admitted from 2003 to 2013 were collected in 2015 via phone interview. The GBS disability scale score was ranked by clinician to evaluate the long-term prognosis. The clini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
18
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The GBS survivors made good functional recovery (median motor FIM score = 90) consistent with other studies [16,[22][23][24][25]. Participants reported residual neurological deficits (motor and sensory) [9,16,26] and minimal change in their physical status in relation to time elapsed since GBS. This is similar to other reports [17,25] that suggest that, at 2-3 years after GBS, there is no substantial expectation of recovery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GBS survivors made good functional recovery (median motor FIM score = 90) consistent with other studies [16,[22][23][24][25]. Participants reported residual neurological deficits (motor and sensory) [9,16,26] and minimal change in their physical status in relation to time elapsed since GBS. This is similar to other reports [17,25] that suggest that, at 2-3 years after GBS, there is no substantial expectation of recovery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Severe ( [16,22,26], those treated in intensive care with severe GBS showed greater impact on QoL, and those with longer acute hospital stay ([11 days) recorded lower function and higher impact scores [22]. No association was found between the MRC Motor Scale Rating scores (at admission to acute hospital), nor time since GBS diagnosis (B6 vs. [6 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[1] The factors which have been found to have an impact on mortality have been age,[35] specific antecedent events[5] rapidity of progression,[6] sensory disturbances, ventilatory requirement,[7] bulbar dysfunction,[8] dysautonomia,[3910] sepsis and pulmonary complications. [310] However, many of these predictors of mortality in literature have included the general cohort of GBS patients, or a small subgroup of mechanically ventilated patients. Few studies have been published from single academic institutions with detailed analysis of the circumstances relating to death and the prognostic factors for the same in a large cohort of mechanically ventilated patients of GBS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies imply age as a predictive factor for poor general outcome in GBS patients [3, 6, 13, 31, 33]. However, keeping in mind the higher mortality just described, it is of interest to address the question of whether older patients also have a poor neurological outcome once surviving the first, most critical period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%