2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.05.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Outcome of Type B Aortic Intramural Hematoma: Comparison With Classic Aortic Dissection Treated by the Same Therapeutic Strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with type A IMH, aortic diameter and thickness have been consistent predictors of progression to rupture, dissection, or dilation. 29,30,39,40 Sueyoshi et al 39 reported a diameter of 440 mm (P ¼ 0.001 with a hazard score of 30) and aortic wall thickness of 10 mm (P ¼ 0.009 with a hazard score of 9) were significant predictors of IMH progression. Kaji reported that age 470 years, ulcerlike plaques in the aorta, wall thickness 412 mm, and diameter 442 mm were predictors.…”
Section: Type B Imh Management and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As with type A IMH, aortic diameter and thickness have been consistent predictors of progression to rupture, dissection, or dilation. 29,30,39,40 Sueyoshi et al 39 reported a diameter of 440 mm (P ¼ 0.001 with a hazard score of 30) and aortic wall thickness of 10 mm (P ¼ 0.009 with a hazard score of 9) were significant predictors of IMH progression. Kaji reported that age 470 years, ulcerlike plaques in the aorta, wall thickness 412 mm, and diameter 442 mm were predictors.…”
Section: Type B Imh Management and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Reports of the rate to progression to AD are variable both in frequency and in time interval. 30,[39][40][41] Between 20 days and 36 months after diagnosis, Sueyoshi et al 39 described 11% (4/35) progressing from IMH to AD, 2 of which were type A dissections. Progression from a descending IMH to an AD is not uncommon among published series.…”
Section: Type B Imh Management and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discussion ! Recent advances in imaging techniques have significantly improved the diagnosis and clinical understanding of IMH [16,17]. However, a consensus has not been reached regarding the optimal management strategies for IMH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed in-hospital mortality rate for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection for hemodynamically stable patients in the absence of branch vessel involvement and periaortic hematoma is 1% [18]. Type B aortic intramural hematomas have the same survival and complication rates as type B aortic dissection, using a similar therapeutic strategy [19]. The occurrence of hypotension/shock (OR for mortality, 23.8; P < 0.0001), absence of chest/back pain on presentation (OR, 3.5; P < 0.01), and branch vessel involvement (OR, 2.9; P = 0.01) are independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in this setting [17].…”
Section: Type B Aortic Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 94%