2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in countries with different socioeconomic environments: an international prospective cohort study

Abstract: BackgroundHospital-based data on the impact of socioeconomic environment on long-term survival after myocardial infarction (MI) are lacking. We compared outcome and quality of secondary prevention in patients after MI living in three different socioeconomic environments including patients from three tertiary-care teaching hospitals with similar service population size in Switzerland, Poland and Ukraine.MethodsThis is a prospective cohort study of patients with a first MI in three different tertiary-care teachi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cardiovascular diseases pose a significant disease burden worldwide and are associated with considerable years of life lost, particularly in low-and middle-income countries [1,2]. Given similar care settings and implementation of international guidelines, the long-term mortality following the first episode of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was more than three-fold higher in developing countries as compared to that in European continents [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiovascular diseases pose a significant disease burden worldwide and are associated with considerable years of life lost, particularly in low-and middle-income countries [1,2]. Given similar care settings and implementation of international guidelines, the long-term mortality following the first episode of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was more than three-fold higher in developing countries as compared to that in European continents [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite well-established guidelines for the management of STEMI, there are still differences with regard to the epidemiology, diagnostics and treatment of patients, leading to diverging morbidity and mortality rates across the globe. Not all reasons for these differences are well understood [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac rehabilitation programs after AMI are safe and effective in increasing exercise tolerance, quality of life, and left ventricular ejection fraction, but they require a close cooperation between cardiologists, general practitioners, and rehabilitation physicians. 28,29 An analysis by Kampfer et al 30 performed in 3 tertiary hospitals in Switzerland, Poland, and Ukraine (high-, middle-, and low -income countries, respectively) showed essential differences in the application of evidence -based treatment and secondary prevention after AMI. The total mortality rate was inversely related to the proportions of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programs and the socioeconomic status of these countries.…”
Section: Methods Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%