Long-term outcomes after revascularization for advanced popliteal artery entrapment syndrome with segmental arterial occlusion

Kim, Seong Yup; Min, Seung-Kee; Ahn, Sanghyun; Min, Sang Il; Ha, Jong‐Won; Kim, Sang Joon

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.06.107

Cited by 40 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CT angiography (CTA), including multiplanar reformation and 3-D volumerendered reconstructions, is helpful in depicting popliteal vascular changes (vessel deviation, stenosis, occlusion, aneurysm formation) and abnormal musculotendinous structures in the setting of PAES [5,19]. Following revascularization for PAES, CTA is recommended to assess graft patency after an abnormal ultrasound (US) [17]. The use of dynamic CTA has also been proposed for the initial workup of PAES, as images of both lower extremities can be obtained at both rest and plantar flexion in a single examination requiring only one contrast bolus [15].…”

Section: Discussion Of Procedures By Variant Variant 1: Suspected Popmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is extremely beneficial in the setting of functional PAES, where lack of an anatomic abnormality limits the sensitivity of cross-sectional modalities like CTA and MRA [18]. In PAES patients treated with popliteal bypass, US duplex Doppler is the first-line modality of choice in assessing graft patency; CTA, MRA, and selective arteriography are reserved for postoperative patients with abnormal US duplex Doppler examinations [17].…”

Section: Discussion Of Procedures By Variant Variant 1: Suspected Popmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Functional PAES (Type IV) results in compression of the popliteal artery despite the presence of an anatomically normal popliteal fossa; its etiology remains unclear. Either subtype may lead to aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm formation, thrombosis, or distal thromboembolism [5][6][7][8][15][16][17][18][19].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Nonatherosclerotic Peripheral Arterial Disease

Imaging¹,

François

Skulborstad

et al. 2019

Journal of the American College of Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A broad range of nonatherosclerotic diseases affect the peripheral arteries. The appropriate initial diagnostic imaging studies vary, depending upon the clinical presentation and suspicion of disease. Accurate vascular imaging relies upon visualization of the vessel lumen, vessel wall, and surrounding soft-tissue structures, with some modalities also offering the ability to characterize blood flow direction and velocity. Furthermore, nonvascular findings are often paramount in supporting a suspected clinical syndrome or guiding surgical management. The scenarios discussed in this document include the initial evaluation of suspected popliteal entrapment syndrome, external iliac artery endofibrosis, lower-extremity inflammatory vasculitides, dissection or connective tissue disease, noninflammatory vascular disease, and vascular trauma.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.Disclaimer: The ACR Committee on Appropriateness Criteria and its expert panels have developed criteria for determining appropriate imaging examinations for diagnosis and treatment of specified medical condition(s). These criteria are intended to guide radiologists, radiation oncologists, and referring physicians in making decisions regarding radiologic imaging and treatment. Generally, the complexity and severity of a patient's clinical condition should dictate the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Only those examinations generally used for evaluation of the patient's condition are ranked. Other imaging studies necessary to evaluate other co-existent diseases or other medical consequences of this condition are not considered in this document. The availability of equipment or personnel may influence the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Imaging techniques classified as investigational by the FDA have not been considered in developing these criteria; however, study of new equipment and applications should be encouraged. The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any specific radiologic examination or treatment must be made by the referring physician and radiologist in light of all the circumstances presented in an individual examination.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Of Procedures By Variant Variant 1: Suspected Popmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussion Of Procedures By Variant Variant 1: Suspected Popmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Nonatherosclerotic Peripheral Arterial Disease

Imaging¹,

François

Skulborstad

et al. 2019

Journal of the American College of Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…15 In the report of Kim et al, no patient underwent musculotendinous division alone, owing to late presentation and diagnosis. 14 The authors thus highlighted the need for early referral to a vascular surgeon for early diagnosis and treatment, especially in this population of young patients.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Five Year Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Popliteal Artery Entrapment Syndrome

Lejay

Delay

Georg

et al. 2016

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The revascularization procedures consisted of nine interposition procedures with vein grafts and six bypass surgeries with vein grafts. Kim, et al 21) also reported that bypass surgery is associated with a worse patency rate than interposition procedures (5-year, 30.0% versus 85.9%; P = 0.15). Comparing these reports, it can be presumed that short interposition vein grafting has a better patency rate than long bypass vein grafting.…”

Section: Long-term Follow-upmentioning

confidence: 96%