2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcomes and resource utilization of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Ontario

Abstract: Compared with open repair, EVAR significantly reduced short-term but not long-term mortality. The EVAR patients spent less time in health institutions, including long-term care facilities, but underwent more imaging studies. Future improvements in EVAR could result in further decreases in reinterventions and subsequent radiologic monitoring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several investigators have included readmission in composite outcomes of aneurysm repair involving reoperation or mortality, 14 or studied readmission over longer time intervals such as 6 to 12 months. 1417 In one prior study, Vogel and colleagues analyzed a Washington State hospital administrative discharge database and found 30-day readmission rates of 11.6% for EVAR and 13.1% for open repair. 18 These readmission rates were similar to our findings of 13.3% and 12.8%, respectively, in National Medicare beneficiaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several investigators have included readmission in composite outcomes of aneurysm repair involving reoperation or mortality, 14 or studied readmission over longer time intervals such as 6 to 12 months. 1417 In one prior study, Vogel and colleagues analyzed a Washington State hospital administrative discharge database and found 30-day readmission rates of 11.6% for EVAR and 13.1% for open repair. 18 These readmission rates were similar to our findings of 13.3% and 12.8%, respectively, in National Medicare beneficiaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endovascular procedures in general cost more than classic open surgery because of increased costs related to stents using or the need of other supplementary procedures. 9 In Ontario, EVAR service is funded in only six vascular surgery centers with a fixed limit on the number of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs that are funded annually.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short-and mid-term outcomes of EVAR have been improving with recent technical and technological advances, and many reports have mentioned the superiority of this low-invasive surgery compared with open repair of AAAs [10][11][12][20][21][22]. However, EVAR is not applicable to all of AAAs, and the IFU for each device are dependent on the morphology of the aneurysm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%