Long term outcomes in octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Comparison of bare metal versus drug eluting stent

Uthamalingam, Shanmugam; Ahmado, Imad; Selvaraj, Vijairam; Dewey, Robert C.; Flynn, James M.

doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.012

Cited by 11 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, the study by Uthamalingum et al comparing the outcomes in octogenarians treated with either DES or BMS showed that at one year, BMS had an increased risk of MACEs compared to DES [ 30 ]. The result for death was not statistically significant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is now clear than DES are the preferred stents in patients with T2DM including both ITDM and NITDM, but questions are raised about the different types of DES, which have different levels of benefits among these patients with T2DM. For example, when PES, SES and BMS were compared in 3852 patients with T2DM, SES showed to be more beneficial than PES for having a longer event free period and a lower ST at 1 year in these patients with T2DM [ 30 ]. Moreover, studies showed EES to be associated with decreased neointima formation, lumen loss and vessel narrowing in patients with T2DM when compared to PES [ 34 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparing the Clinical Outcomes between Drug Eluting Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Patients with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundSeveral studies have shown Drug Eluting Stents (DES) to be better compared to Bare Metal Stents (BMS) in patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Since, the adverse clinical outcomes in patients with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (ITDM) implanted with DES and BMS have not been previously studied, we aim to compare the clinical outcomes in similar patients with cardiovascular diseases, treated with DES and BMS.MethodsRandomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing patients treated with DES and BMS were searched from PubMed and EMBASE databases. Outcome data for the patients with ITDM were carefully extracted. Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs), mortality, Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR), Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), Myocardial Infarction (MI) and Stent Thrombosis (ST) were considered as the clinical endpoints for this analysis. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and the pooled analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsTen RCTs consisting of 830 patients with ITDM (477 patients in the DES group and 353 patients in the BMS group) from a total number of 9,141 patients were included in this analysis. During a follow-up period from one month to one year, MACEs were not increased with the use of DES in these patients with ITDM. At 9 months, MACEs were significantly lower in the DES group with OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23–0.72; P = 0.002 with no increase in mortality. TVR and TLR also favored the DES group with OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22–0.88, P = 0.02 and OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14–0.53; P = 0.0001 respectively at 9 months, and OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23–0.94, P = 0.03 and OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14–0.55; P = 0.0003 respectively at one year. Results for MI, and ST were not statistically significant.ConclusionCompared to BMS, DES were associated with a significantly lower rate of repeated revascularization, without any increase in MACEs or mortality in these patients with ITDM during a follow up period of one year. However, due to the very small population size, further studies with a larger number of randomized patients are required to completely solve this issue.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing the Clinical Outcomes between Drug Eluting Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Patients with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similar to our findings, diabetes mellitus is shown as an independent risk factor for mortality in the elderly with chronic total occlusion treated by PCI. 16,17,21,22 This suggests the devastating effects of diabetes mellitus on the body, in particular to cardiovascular systems.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ind J Car Dis Wom 2020;5: [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Published online April 9, 2020 Nevertheless, elderly patients are less likely to undergo revascularization than younger patients, despite having more extensive CAD. Age alone is often the main reason why PCI is avoided.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender-wise Long-term Predictors for Major Adverse Cardiac Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Elderly Population

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background We aimed to recognize the predictors of long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in the elderly candidates for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in relation to gender at our center. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the data of the elderly patients (age ≥70 years) who underwent elective PCI who met our study criteria in our institution during 2008 and 2018. Demographical data, clinical history, angiographic details, PCI procedure, and follow-up data of the patients enrolled in the study were studied by using the angiographic and PCI procedure details. Patients were characterized in the study group as those with or without MACE, which were then compared and analyzed using the statistical analysis in a univariable and binary linear regression analysis. Results A total of 355 elderly patients (older than 70 years) undergoing elective PCI were selected who fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 277 patients were men and had more comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of heart failure, previous coronary artery bypass graft, and presentation with acute coronary syndrome. MACE occurred in 24 events patients of whom 20 were suffering from DM. Binary logistic regression showed that the only determinant for the 1-year follow-up outcome is diabetes (p = 0.000). Even in univariate analysis, DM (0.01) is the determinant. DM is a strong predictor for death in univariate analysis (p = 0.00). Conclusion PCI is a safe and effective method of coronary revascularization in elderly patients, and some risk factors can predict long-term MACE in this group of patients.

show abstract

“…53,54) Recent 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization made no recommendations for the treatment of coronary artery disease in this subset of high risk patients. 55) Moreover, there are few data in the literature because meta-analyses have rarely been performed on the elderly population, 56) and clinical prospective randomized trials or multicenter studies did not generally study elderly patients, or included only a small proportion of these patients.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Arterial Conduits in the Elderly

Nicolini

Vezzani²,

Romano

et al. 2017

Int. Heart J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryAlthough improved long-term outcomes obtained with the use of arterial grafts for coronary revascularization in comparison with the traditional association of a single arterial and saphenous vein grafts have been demonstrated in the overall population, the efficacy of this newer technique in the elderly is difficult to prove because their shorter life expectancy due to advanced heart disease, associated with severe comorbidities. Moreover, more widespread use of this technique is limited by the concerns on the potential morbidity, particularly the longer time required to perform the operation and the possibility of deep sternal wound infection in case of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting due to the decreased blood supply to the sternum and surrounding tissues.The review of the recent literature indicates that the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries in very elderly patients should not be considered routinely. It seems reasonable to avoid it in octogenarians in the presence of well-known predictors of sternal complications such as diabetes, morbid obesity, and severe chronic lung disease.There is also still controversy about the superiority of the radial artery over the saphenous vein graft as a second or third conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization, although the majority of recent studies seem to support more liberal use of the radial artery as second arterial conduit in the elderly. Although a clinical benefit of arterial graft revascularization cannot be formally excluded for elderly patients, the increased complexity of this technique suggests that careful clinical judgment is necessary to select grafts for individual patients.(Int Heart J 2017; 58: 647-653) Key words: Coronary artery disease, Old patients, Arterial grafts N owadays a growing number of patients are older at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and present with a clinical history characterized by more comorbidities than in the past. However, despite the increasing proportions of elderly patients with a worse risk profile for elective CABG, mortality in elderly patients over recent decades has dramatically declined.1) In fact, recent studies on elderly patients operated with CABG reported a 30-day mortality rate ranging between 3.7 and 16.8%, a 1-year mortality between 8% and 10.8% and a 5-year mortality ranging from 28.4% to 31%. 2-6)It is well recognized that octogenarians have a higher risk of post-operative complications, 7) require greater clinical and economic resources, and have worse but acceptable short and long-term survival in comparison with younger patients. However, improvements in technical management, particularly the development of innovative extracorporeal circulatory systems, the use of off-pump CABG and the increased use of pedicled arterial conduits have been proven effective in improving outcomes, although they have not completely eliminated the morbidity in this high-risk population. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Although improved long-term outcomes obtained with the use of ...

show abstract

Long term outcomes in octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Comparison of bare metal versus drug eluting stent

Cited by 11 publications

References 25 publications

Comparing the Clinical Outcomes between Drug Eluting Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Patients with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparing the Clinical Outcomes between Drug Eluting Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Patients with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials

Gender-wise Long-term Predictors for Major Adverse Cardiac Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Elderly Population

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Arterial Conduits in the Elderly

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About