Long-term outcomes of a long, partially covered metal stent for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (with video)

Nakai, Yousuke; Shimoda, Tatsuya; Hakuta, Ryunosuke; Ishigaki, Kazunaga; Saito, Kei; Saito, Tomotaka; Takahara, Naminatsu; Hamada, Tsuyoshi; Kogure, Hirofumi; Nogchi, Kensaku; Ito, Yukiko; Isayama, Hiroyuki; Koike, Kazuhiko

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3856

Cited by 84 publications

(79 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Concerns about stent migration or side-branch blockage when covered metal stents are placed transhepatically should be further elucidated. No transhepatic stent migration occurred in this study or in a larger recent series on hepaticogastrostomy using a related partially covered metal stent [8]. Tissue hyperplasia in the uncovered hepatic end of the stent provided anchorage.…”

mentioning

confidence: 44%

Combined ERCP and transhepatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided stent placement for biliary drainage in malignant hilar obstruction: not too good to be true

Pérez-Miranda

2020

Endoscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 44%

Combined ERCP and transhepatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided stent placement for biliary drainage in malignant hilar obstruction: not too good to be true

Pérez-Miranda

2020

Endoscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In this study involving 10 referral centers, EUS-BD for unresectable MBO with SAA patients was technically and clinically successful in 100% and 95% of enrolled patients, respectively. Previous large-scale studies reported the efficacy of EUS-BD for MBO; 5,9,13,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] however, these studies included a limited number of patients bearing SAA (Table 3). Compared with these studies, this study aimed to determine the efficacy of EUS-BD specifically for SAA patients.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction with surgically altered anatomy: a multicenter prospective registration study

Minaga

Takenaka

Ogura

et al. 2020

Therap Adv Gastroenterol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Endoscopic treatment for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in patients bearing surgically altered anatomy (SAA) is not well-established. Although endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as a new treatment option for MBO, limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in patients with SAA. We conducted a multicenter prospective registration study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in this population. Methods: This study involved 10 referral centers in Japan. Patients with SAA who were scheduled to receive EUS-BD for unresectable MBO between May 2016 and September 2018 were prospectively registered. The primary endpoint was technical success and the secondary outcomes were clinical success, procedure time, procedure-related adverse events (AEs), stent patency, and overall survival. Results: In total, 40 patients were prospectively enrolled. The surgical reconstruction methods were gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (47.5%), gastrectomy with Billroth-II reconstruction (15%), pancreaticoduodenectomy (27.5%), and hepaticojejunostomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (10%). EUS-BD was performed for primary biliary drainage in 31 patients and for rescue biliary drainage in nine patients. Transmural stenting alone (60%), antegrade stenting alone (5%), and a combination of the two techniques (35%) were selected for patients treated with EUS-BD. Technical and clinical success rates were 100% (95% confidence interval, 91.2–100.0%) and 95% (95% confidence interval, 83.1–99.4%), respectively. Mean procedure time was 36.5 min. Early AEs were noted in six patients (15%): three self-limited bile leak, one bile peritonitis, and two pneumoperitonea. Late AEs occurred in six patients (15%): one jejunal ulcer and five stent occlusions. Stent patency rate after 3 months of survival was 95.7% (22/23). Median overall survival was 96 days. Conclusion: EUS-BD for MBO in patients with SAA appears to be effective and safe not only as a rescue drainage technique after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiography but also as a primary drainage technique. Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN000022101

show abstract

“…47,58 Recurrent biliary obstruction can occur 5.5-8.5 months after the procedure. 37,56,58 EUS-HGS is primarily performed for malignant obstruction. Recently, it has been used for anastomotic strictures in patients with a surgically altered anatomy 5,59 (Fig.…”

Section: Outcomes and Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The technical success rate has increased to 90–100% with refinements in equipment and techniques [ 47 , 58 ]. Recurrent biliary obstruction can occur 5.5–8.5 months after the procedure [ 37 , 56 , 58 ]. EUS-HGS is primarily performed for malignant obstruction.…”

Section: Outcomes and Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

What You Need to Know Before Performing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Hepaticogastrostomy

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the primary treatment modality for bile duct obstruction. When ERCP is unsuccessful, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage can be an alternative method. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as a treatment option for biliary obstruction, especially after ERCP failure. EUS-BD offers transluminal intrahepatic and extrahepatic drainage through a transgastric and transduodenal approach. EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is an excellent choice for patients with hilar strictures or those with a surgically altered anatomy. The optimal steps in EUS-HGS are case selection, bile duct visualization, puncture-site selection, wire insertion and manipulation, tract dilation, and stent placement. Caution should be taken at each step to prevent complications. Dedicated devices for EUS-HGS have been developed to improve the technical success rate and reduce complications. This technical review focuses on the essential practical points at each step of EUS-HGS.

show abstract

Long-term outcomes of a long, partially covered metal stent for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (with video)

Cited by 84 publications

References 34 publications

Combined ERCP and transhepatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided stent placement for biliary drainage in malignant hilar obstruction: not too good to be true

Combined ERCP and transhepatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided stent placement for biliary drainage in malignant hilar obstruction: not too good to be true

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction with surgically altered anatomy: a multicenter prospective registration study

What You Need to Know Before Performing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Hepaticogastrostomy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About