2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4672-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a comparison study to surgery using propensity score-matched analysis

Abstract: The overall survival was similar between the ESD and surgery groups. Compared with surgery, the benefits of ESD included fewer late complications and shorter hospital stay duration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the risk of LNM is negligible, controversies exist in terms of the oncologic safety of ESD for EGC meeting the expanded indication criteria; therefore, additional long-term outcome studies should be widely performed to evaluate the safety and benefits of ESD over surgery so as to support the current indication criteria. In our study with a propensityscore-matched analysis, the ESD group had OS and DSS rates similar to those of the surgery group, in accordance with the findings of previous studies [16,[19][20][21][22]. During the follow-up period, recurrences at regional lymph nodes or distant recurrence were not found in the ESD group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the risk of LNM is negligible, controversies exist in terms of the oncologic safety of ESD for EGC meeting the expanded indication criteria; therefore, additional long-term outcome studies should be widely performed to evaluate the safety and benefits of ESD over surgery so as to support the current indication criteria. In our study with a propensityscore-matched analysis, the ESD group had OS and DSS rates similar to those of the surgery group, in accordance with the findings of previous studies [16,[19][20][21][22]. During the follow-up period, recurrences at regional lymph nodes or distant recurrence were not found in the ESD group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, it is important to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of ESD and surgery for EGC meeting the expanded indication criteria. Although the long-term outcomes of patients with EGC meeting the expanded indication criteria are reported to be similar after either ESD or surgery [19][20][21][22], there are limited data regarding the optimal treatment strategy for EGC. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent ESD or surgical resection for EGC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Data from retrospective series show comparable oncological outcomes with respect to R0 resection, recurrence and overall survival in patients with EGC treated by ESD or surgery. [17][18][19] However, ESD for EGC is preferable, as patients experienced shorter operative time (90 vs 260 min), lower overall complication rates (5 vs 15%), and hospital stays (3-7 days vs 9-14 days), compared to surgery. 17,19 Furthermore, gastric surgery is expensive and its potential alteration to digestive function can be life-altering for patients.…”
Section: Role Of Esd: Comparing Outcomes For Early Gastrointestinal Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, metachronous gastric cancer were detected in 5 (14.3%) of the periodically followed up patients after ESD. The incidence rate of metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection is 4.9-9.1% [2,[15][16][17]., which is higher than that after surgery due to preservation of the entire stomach. Therefore, careful EGD surveillance instead of abdominal CT surveillance is important to detect metachronous cancer at an early stage in patients within expanded criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%