“…explantations rates have been reported to vary from 10% to 24%, most commonly because of loss of efficacy. 13,14,19 Based on explantation rates in the literature, the causes for explantation in the current study are comparable with rates and indications reported previously in other studies. Reimplantation may be an option in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…the remaining patients had replacement of the lead alone. in assessing the baseline characteristics of each group, the median CCf-fis was found to be significantly higher preoperatively in the reimplantation group as compared with the index implantation controls (index implantation: 17 (range, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; reimplantation: 19 (range, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; p = 0.002). in addition, the postoperative median CCf-fis was found to be significantly higher in the reimplantation group (index implantation: 7 (range, 0-20); reimplantation: 12 (range, 3-20) p = 0.028).…”
“…explantations rates have been reported to vary from 10% to 24%, most commonly because of loss of efficacy. 13,14,19 Based on explantation rates in the literature, the causes for explantation in the current study are comparable with rates and indications reported previously in other studies. Reimplantation may be an option in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…the remaining patients had replacement of the lead alone. in assessing the baseline characteristics of each group, the median CCf-fis was found to be significantly higher preoperatively in the reimplantation group as compared with the index implantation controls (index implantation: 17 (range, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; reimplantation: 19 (range, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; p = 0.002). in addition, the postoperative median CCf-fis was found to be significantly higher in the reimplantation group (index implantation: 7 (range, 0-20); reimplantation: 12 (range, 3-20) p = 0.028).…”
“…A common method defining success after SNS is a weekly reduction in frequency of major incontinence episodes by at least 50%. Using these criteria, the European SNS Outcome Study Group found long‐term success rates in 71.3% of patients, and full continence (no episodes of major incontinence) in 50.0% . However, using quantitative continence scoring systems, ‘full continence’ is regarded as St Mark's continence score of zero, which is uncommonly achieved with any procedure for faecal incontinence and we feel that quantitative scoring more accurately reflects the true definition of continence which includes involuntary soiling, urgency and flatus incontinence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has redefined the treatment algorithm for faecal incontinence . One attraction of the procedure is the ability to do a temporary trial of nerve stimulation (peripheral nerve evaluation, PNE) to assess whether long‐term stimulation is likely to be successful, with 65–90% of PNE cases showing improvement and progressing to a permanent stimulator .…”
In this observational study, limited by the absence of a placebo control group, SNS significantly improved continence and quality of life, and patient satisfaction was high.
“…Sacral nerve modulation has been shown to be effective for the treatment of severe FI when conservative measures have failed . It has become nowadays a standard treatment for this condition.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.