Long-Term Outcomes of the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) Technique in Patients With Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease

Abstract

Background: The Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) reconstruction is an endovascular technique, developed to reconstruct the aortic bifurcation in the most optimal anatomical and physiological manner. Short-term data were promising, but long-term data are still lacking. The objective was to report the long-term outcomes of CERAB for extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease and to identify predictors for loss of primary patency. Methods: Consecutive electively treated patients with CERAB for aorto-iliac occlusive disease in a single hospital were identified and analyzed. Baseline and procedural data and follow-up were collected at 6-weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Technical success, procedural, and 30-day complications were evaluated, as well as overall survival. Patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization rates were analyzed using Kaplan Meier curves. Uni- and multivariate analysis were performed to identify possible predictors of failure. Results: One hundred and sixty patients were included (79 male). Indication for treatment was intermittent claudication for 121 patients (75.6%) and 133 patients (83.1%) had a TASC-II D lesion. Technical success was obtained in 95.6% of patients and the 30-day mortality rate was 1.3%. The 5-year primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 88.1%, and 95.0%, respectively, with a freedom-from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rate of 84.4%. The strongest predictor of loss of primary patency of CERAB was a previous aorto-iliac intervention (odds ratio [OR]=5.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30; 22.07), p=0.020). In patients not previously treated in the aorto-iliac tract, 5-year primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were 85.1%, 94.4%, and 96.9%, respectively. At 5-year follow-up, an improved Rutherford was found in 97.9% of patients and the freedom from major amputation rate was 100%. Conclusion: The CERAB technique is related to good long-term outcomes, particularly in primary cases. In patients that had prior treatment for aorto-iliac occlusive disease, there were more reinterventions and therefore surveillance should likely be more intense. Clinical Impact The Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of the Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) reconstruction was designed to improve outcomes of endovascular treatment of extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease. At 5-year follow-up clinical improvement was found in 97.9% of patients without major amputations. The 5-year overall primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 88.1%, and 95.0%, respectively, with a freedom-from clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate of 84.4%. Significantly better patency rates were observed for patients that were never treated before in the target area. The data implicate that CERAB are a valid treatment option for patients with extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease. For patients previously treated in the target area, other treatment options might be considered, or more intensive follow-up surveillance is warranted.

Combination of BeGraft and Solaris Stent Grafts for the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of Aortic Bifurcation—BS-CERAB Technique

“…Nowadays, CERAB results after 5 years of follow-up have been published. Rouwenhorst et al [16], reported on 160 patients with extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease consecutive electively treated by CERAB; in total, 75.6% presented claudication and 83.1% had TASC-II D lesions. The 5-year primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 88.1%, and 95.0%, respectively.…”

Endovascular Treatment of a Forty-Year-Old Post-Traumatic Knee Arteriovenous Fistula

“…In this context, the creation of a neo-bifurcation very similar to the covered endovascular repair of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) technique in the aorta and the coil-based gutter embolization offered an alternative option for such complex AVF. 7 We refer to this technique as the Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of Tibiofibular Bifurcation, or CERTIFIB (Figure 2). In this procedure, three covered coronary stents were strategically positioned to cover both the bifurcation and the main trunk of the vessel.…”

“…In this context, the creation of a neo-bifurcation very similar to the covered endovascular repair of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) technique in the aorta and the coil-based gutter embolization offered an alternative option for such complex AVF. 7…”