2016
DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2016006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long term patterns in the late summer trophic niche of the invasive pumpkinseed sunfishLepomis gibbosus

Abstract: -Quantifying the trophic dynamics of invasive species in novel habitats is important for predicting the success of potential invaders and evaluating their ecological effects. The North American pumpkinseed sunfish Lepomis gibbosus is a successful invader in Europe, where it has caused negative ecological effects primarily through trophic interactions. Here, we quantified variations in the late summer trophic niche of pumpkinseed during establishment and integration in the mainstem of the Guadiana river, using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, plant material was of negligible importance in the diet of pumpkinseed but was commonly found and in high proportions in the diet of cichlid. This is consistent with previous studies indicating that plant material is key in the diet of cichlids in native (Gutierrez et al, 1986;Yafe et al, 2002) and invaded areas (Ribeiro et al, 2007), but that pumpkinseed seldom uses this resource in both native (Mittelbach, 1984;Mittelbach et al, 1992) and invaded areas (Godinho et al, 1997;García-Berthou and Moreno-Amich, 2000;Gkenas et al, 2016). This may at least to some extent reflects variations in morphological traits and feeding capabilities between species, as for instance the presence of pharyngeal jaw apparatus in pumpkinseeds may potentiate the use of hardshelled prey relative to other resources (Wainwright, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, plant material was of negligible importance in the diet of pumpkinseed but was commonly found and in high proportions in the diet of cichlid. This is consistent with previous studies indicating that plant material is key in the diet of cichlids in native (Gutierrez et al, 1986;Yafe et al, 2002) and invaded areas (Ribeiro et al, 2007), but that pumpkinseed seldom uses this resource in both native (Mittelbach, 1984;Mittelbach et al, 1992) and invaded areas (Godinho et al, 1997;García-Berthou and Moreno-Amich, 2000;Gkenas et al, 2016). This may at least to some extent reflects variations in morphological traits and feeding capabilities between species, as for instance the presence of pharyngeal jaw apparatus in pumpkinseeds may potentiate the use of hardshelled prey relative to other resources (Wainwright, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Both species are generally less than 13 cm in total length (TL), live up to 7 years and mature in 2 years, and build and guard spawning nests and fry (Rios-Cardenas and Webster, 2005;Ribeiro et al, 2008;Ribeiro and Collares-Pereira, 2010). The pumpkinseed is invertivore whereas the cichlid is omnivore, though both prey upon macroinvertebrates, shifting from small, soft-bodied towards large, hard-shelled prey during ontogeny (Godinho et al, 1997;Ribeiro et al, 2007, Gkenas et al, 2016.…”
Section: Study Area and Model Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first detailed study on the habitat use of L. gibbosus and its interactions with native fish species was undertaken in a small river catchment of southern England (Klaar et al, 2004), where escapee L. gibbosus from floodplain ponds and reservoirs have become established. This and follow-up studies (Vilizzi et al, 2012;Stakėnas et al, 2013) revealed strong habitat associations between L. gibbosus and native brown trout Salmo trutta, but suggested little or no impact (Gkenas et al, 2016). Although these reports are usually from lentic systems (Cucherousset et al, 2009), a recent study from a stream system in Spain revealed adverse aggressive impacts by L. gibbosus on non-native crayfish and especially endemic fishes and frogs (Almeida et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The latter studies have usually provided contrasting conclusions suggesting either potential ecological consequences or relatively harmless impacts (Godinho et al, 1997;Gutiérrez-Estrada et al, 2000;Villeneuve et al, 2005;Cucherousset et al, 2009;Almeida et al, 2014). However, despite the species' long-time presence in Europe and its fast spread across Anatolia, there have been only few studies on its habitat interactions in this area and virtually none in southern Europe (Gkenas et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%