2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term performance of concrete surface coatings in soil exposure of marine environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the diffusion coefficients presented in Table 2 for HIDRO and SEAL have been obtained considering the w/c ratio of the REF alternative (current bridge design), namely w/c = 0.45. However, the durability performance of these treatments is very sensitive to ageing and weathering as derived from the existing literature [33,[35][36][37]. In particular, conventional treatments are very affected by microcracking of the concrete cover, for when those cracks are deeper than the treatment thickness, barrier properties are lost and the impregnation becomes ineffective [38,39].…”
Section: Durability Performance Of the Preventive Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the diffusion coefficients presented in Table 2 for HIDRO and SEAL have been obtained considering the w/c ratio of the REF alternative (current bridge design), namely w/c = 0.45. However, the durability performance of these treatments is very sensitive to ageing and weathering as derived from the existing literature [33,[35][36][37]. In particular, conventional treatments are very affected by microcracking of the concrete cover, for when those cracks are deeper than the treatment thickness, barrier properties are lost and the impregnation becomes ineffective [38,39].…”
Section: Durability Performance Of the Preventive Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e reason was revealed that NS and silica fume not only consumed CH to form the dense C-S-H but also exerted the excellent filling effect, thereby declining the porosity, increasing density, improving the microstructure including interfacial transition zone (ITZ), and enhancing the mechanical performance [23][24][25][26]. Additionally, the inorganic materials generally performed better antiaging property and also showed excellent ability to augment the impermeability by coating on the surface [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional anticorrosive coatings such as epoxy anticorrosive coatings, rubber anticorrosive coatings, and polyurethane anticorrosive coatings had large solvent pollution, short antiseptic life, and poor weather resistance. The modified coatings did not change the internal structure and could not have excellent properties [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%