2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term Performance of Fresh Autologous Pericardium for Mitral Valve Leaflet Repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, however, some reports have indicated that glutaraldehyde treatment might be associated with pericardial calcification [10,11]. Excellent long-term outcomes of mitral valve leaflet repair using fresh autologous pericardium were recently reported (89% per 10 years of freedom from reoperation) [11]. This report demonstrated that glutaraldehyde treatment of the pericardium might be associated with late calcification and mitral valve stenosis due to leaflet thickening and loss of pliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, however, some reports have indicated that glutaraldehyde treatment might be associated with pericardial calcification [10,11]. Excellent long-term outcomes of mitral valve leaflet repair using fresh autologous pericardium were recently reported (89% per 10 years of freedom from reoperation) [11]. This report demonstrated that glutaraldehyde treatment of the pericardium might be associated with late calcification and mitral valve stenosis due to leaflet thickening and loss of pliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Glutaraldehyde treatment may repor-tedly improve the durability of the reconstructed pericardium leaflet, providing a lower rate of calcification, shrinkage, or disruption than fresh autologous pericardium [8,9]. In contrast, however, some reports have indicated that glutaraldehyde treatment might be associated with pericardial calcification [10,11]. Excellent long-term outcomes of mitral valve leaflet repair using fresh autologous pericardium were recently reported (89% per 10 years of freedom from reoperation) [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow-up TTE test showed normal systolic and diastolic cardiac function in all the 10 cases. This may be related to the use of fresh pericardial patches, as it was reported that fresh autologous pericardium showed good biological characteristics, such as free of retraction, thickening, stiffness, fibrosis and calcification [15], thus it possibly does not affect right ventricular function in midterm period. In addition, the twopatch technique not only protects the moderator band, an important anatomical structure of the right ventricle, but also avoids a too large patch to cover the entire inner right ventricular wall and thus limit the diastolic function of the right ventricle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that an early repair-oriented surgical approach can achieve higher repair rates with good long-term durability of the repair and a very low rate of recurrence of endocarditis. Quinn and colleagues 10 recently reported the long-term performance of fresh autologous pericardium for mitral leaflet repair, including 69% of patients with IE. Fresh autologous pericardium is an excellent material for complex mitral leaflet patch repairs, which can be used with the expectation of durable long-term function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned before, this group expanded the use of fresh autologous pericardium for mitral valve repair. 10 Feringa and colleagues 12 reviewed 24 reports that included 1194 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for IE; the repair rate was 39% and mitral valve repair was associated with better clinical outcomes including mortality, reoperation, recurrent endocarditis, and cerebrovascular events. Byrne and colleagues 13 reported the surgical management of endocarditis, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline, in 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%