2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Performance of Recycled Concrete Aggregate for Subsurface Drainage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arulrajach et al [52], based on constant head test experiments, estimated the coefficient of permeability in range of 2.04 × 10 −3 to 3.3 × 10 −8 m/s, which indicates the existence of non-Darcian flow. Tests performed by McCulloch et al [53] were conducted for RCAs with 4% fines and with fractions of 0–50 mm. The reported coefficients of permeability were in the range of 1 × 10 −4 to 3 × 10 −4 m/s.…”
Section: Results Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Arulrajach et al [52], based on constant head test experiments, estimated the coefficient of permeability in range of 2.04 × 10 −3 to 3.3 × 10 −8 m/s, which indicates the existence of non-Darcian flow. Tests performed by McCulloch et al [53] were conducted for RCAs with 4% fines and with fractions of 0–50 mm. The reported coefficients of permeability were in the range of 1 × 10 −4 to 3 × 10 −4 m/s.…”
Section: Results Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported coefficients of permeability were in the range of 1 × 10 −4 to 3 × 10 −4 m/s. Tests on RCAs with poorly graded RCAs with fractions of 6–12 mm and with no fine content have proven a high water permeability of such material with a coefficient of permeability of approximately 1 × 10 −3 m/s [53]. Tests performed on an RCA blend with gradation of 0−50 mm and with 5% fine contents have shown that the coefficient of permeability calculated based on a constant head permeability test is equal to 1.06 × 10 −6 m/s [54].…”
Section: Results Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this behaviour, their use is not recommended, or it is even forbidden, in some states of the USA [ 36 , 37 ]. However, there are also some studies concluding that tufa formation and recementation are not significant, especially if the percentage of fines is limited to a small percentage [ 19 , 31 , 32 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the restrictions, or even prohibitions, on the use of RCA and RSSA in unbound granular layers of road pavements, very few studies have been carried out to assess their behaviour as drainage materials [ 16 , 19 , 32 , 38 ], which has limited their recycling in drainage structures of geotechnical works (e.g., rainwater drainage layer in landfills, vertical sand drains, and back drainage of earth retaining walls) and road pavements (e.g., longitudinal edge drains, transverse and horizontal drains, permeable bases, and underdrains/deep drains).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing researches mostly concerned about the design of the mixing ratio of certain aggregate in the concrete, or the test on the performance of ordinary permeable concrete in terms of mechanics, permeability, and frost resistance [24][25][26][27][28][29], and very few of them have paid attention to the basic properties of recycled aggregate permeable concrete made of reused construction wastes. To fill in such research gap, this paper studied the mechanical properties and durability of recycled aggregate permeable concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%