2020
DOI: 10.7554/elife.58042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term potentiation is independent of the C-tail of the GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit

Abstract: We tested the proposal that the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the AMPAR subunit GluA1 is required for LTP. We found that a knock-in mouse lacking the CTD of GluA1 expresses normal LTP and spatial memory, assayed by the Morris water maze. Our results support a model in which LTP generates synaptic slots, which capture passively diffusing AMPARs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most recently, a knock-in mouse study in which the C-terminal domain of endogenous GluA1 was truncated reported no deficit in basal synaptic transmission, LTP, or spatial memory ( Diaz-Alonso et al., 2020 ). These authors propose an alternative model in which it is the number of slots rather than the C-terminal domains of the AMPAR subunits themselves that regulate the extent of AMPAR surface expression and plasticity at synapses ( Diaz-Alonso et al., 2020 ). Thus, it is possible that phosphorylation is required to overcome a yet unidentified, negative modulatory effect, which is lacking in phosphodeficient AMPAR subunits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most recently, a knock-in mouse study in which the C-terminal domain of endogenous GluA1 was truncated reported no deficit in basal synaptic transmission, LTP, or spatial memory ( Diaz-Alonso et al., 2020 ). These authors propose an alternative model in which it is the number of slots rather than the C-terminal domains of the AMPAR subunits themselves that regulate the extent of AMPAR surface expression and plasticity at synapses ( Diaz-Alonso et al., 2020 ). Thus, it is possible that phosphorylation is required to overcome a yet unidentified, negative modulatory effect, which is lacking in phosphodeficient AMPAR subunits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is possible that phosphorylation is required to overcome a yet unidentified, negative modulatory effect, which is lacking in phosphodeficient AMPAR subunits. Overall, the currently available evidence suggests that plasticity involves the formation/unmasking or removal/masking of slots in the PSD to snare or release passively diffusing AMPARs, potentially irrespective of their phosphorylation or other posttranslational modifications ( Diaz-Alonso et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LTP induces recruitment of AMPAR while LTD is accompanied by internalization of AMPAR ( Yuste and Bonhoeffer, 2001 ; Malinow and Malenka, 2002 ; Matsuzaki et al, 2004 ). In this regard, the necessity and sufficiency of GluA1 and GluA2 C-terminal domain for LTP and LTD, respectively with differential implications on spatial and contextual learning and memory has been recently reported ( Zhou et al, 2018 ) even if discrepancies regarding the requirement of C-terminal domain of GluA1 for LTP were reported by other authors (see Díaz-Alonso et al, 2020 ). GluA1 trafficking is strongly associated with LTP ( Lee et al, 2003 ; Makino and Malinow, 2009 ; Huganir and Nicoll, 2013 ) while GluA2 plays a prominent role in LTD ( Diering and Huganir, 2018 ).…”
Section: Memory Retrieval: An Ampar Storymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergent roles of the GluA1 CTD in synaptic plasticity have been extensively documented (13,(15)(16)(17). However, the observation that the CTD-lacking GluA1 is still present at the postsynaptic membrane and mediates LTP (18,19) challenged the absolute requirement for GluA1 CTD in synaptic transmission and plasticity, indicating that other domains, such as the ATD, might have a previously uncovered role in LTP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%