2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgsce.2023.205113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term production forecast in tight and shale reservoirs: Adapting probability density functions for decline curve analysis

Hamzeh Alimohammadi,
Shengnan Nancy Chen
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning (ML) excels in extracting information from high-dimensional, complex data, playing a significant role in predicting reservoir production capacity automatically in supervised or unsupervised modes [24]. Extensive studies by scholars have shown the superiority of ML algorithms over traditional prediction methods like logistic regression in forecasting reservoir production capacity [25,26]. Zhou et al [27] combined principal component analysis, cluster analysis, and regression analysis to compute shale gas production in specific regions based on variables such as hydraulic fracture count, well deviation, vertical depth, and fracturing fluid.…”
Section: Corresponding Loss Function Y Leftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) excels in extracting information from high-dimensional, complex data, playing a significant role in predicting reservoir production capacity automatically in supervised or unsupervised modes [24]. Extensive studies by scholars have shown the superiority of ML algorithms over traditional prediction methods like logistic regression in forecasting reservoir production capacity [25,26]. Zhou et al [27] combined principal component analysis, cluster analysis, and regression analysis to compute shale gas production in specific regions based on variables such as hydraulic fracture count, well deviation, vertical depth, and fracturing fluid.…”
Section: Corresponding Loss Function Y Leftmentioning
confidence: 99%