2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term prognosis of tooth autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
120
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
120
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Eleven radiological variables were selected based on the available evidence in literature regarding their relation to treatment outcome (Almpani, Papageorgiou, & Papadopoulos, ; Atala‐Acevedo et al, ; Chung, Tu, Lin, & Lu, ; Machado, do Nascimento, Ferreira, Mattos, & Vilella, ). The radiological variables were based on the follow‐up protocols of multiple studies concerning autotransplantation of maxillary canines (Ahlberg, Bystedt, Eliasson, & Odenrick, ; Arikan et al, ; Chambers, Reade, & Poker, ; Gonnissen et al, ; Hall & Reade, ; Kallu, Vinckier, Politis, Mwalili, & Willems, ; Kvint, Lindsten, Magnusson, Nilsson, & Bjerklin, ; Lownie, Cleaton‐Jones, Fatti, & Lownie, ; Patel, Fanshawe, Bister, & Cobourne, ; Pogrel, ; Sagne, Lennartsson, & Thilander, ; Sagne & Thilander, ; Schatz & Joho, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven radiological variables were selected based on the available evidence in literature regarding their relation to treatment outcome (Almpani, Papageorgiou, & Papadopoulos, ; Atala‐Acevedo et al, ; Chung, Tu, Lin, & Lu, ; Machado, do Nascimento, Ferreira, Mattos, & Vilella, ). The radiological variables were based on the follow‐up protocols of multiple studies concerning autotransplantation of maxillary canines (Ahlberg, Bystedt, Eliasson, & Odenrick, ; Arikan et al, ; Chambers, Reade, & Poker, ; Gonnissen et al, ; Hall & Reade, ; Kallu, Vinckier, Politis, Mwalili, & Willems, ; Kvint, Lindsten, Magnusson, Nilsson, & Bjerklin, ; Lownie, Cleaton‐Jones, Fatti, & Lownie, ; Patel, Fanshawe, Bister, & Cobourne, ; Pogrel, ; Sagne, Lennartsson, & Thilander, ; Sagne & Thilander, ; Schatz & Joho, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, another available option may be replacing the missing tooth with another tooth. [49][50][51][52] Reported complications of autotransplantation include pulp necrosis, root resorption, and hypermobility. 48 Success rates for this procedure are as high as 96% and survival rates as high as 98% for autotransplanted teeth.…”
Section: Autotransplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Success rates for this procedure are as high as 96% and survival rates as high as 98% for autotransplanted teeth. [49][50][51][52] Reported complications of autotransplantation include pulp necrosis, root resorption, and hypermobility. 53 Not only is autotransplantation a good option because of high success rates, it is also a good option for growing patients who cannot have dental implants placed.…”
Section: Autotransplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many reasons for tooth autotransplantation, but the most common indication is the natural replacement of a tooth as a result of complicated dental fracture, deep caries or failure in endodontic treatment. In addition, tooth transplantation may be employed to treat patients with congenital tooth absence, pre-existing impacted or ectopic teeth and spaces [4][5][6]. Autotransplantation is recommended in patients with orthodontic indications, which requires extraction of their permanent teeth when potential donors are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%