1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00040312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long term regeneration by somatic embryogenesis in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) tissue cultures derived from apical meristem explants

Abstract: Callus cultures were initiated from apical meristem explants of one to fourweek-old aseptically-grown barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Atlas 57) plants. Embryogenic callus and plants were produced in three separate experiments; the cultures have retained regenerative capacity for three years after initiation. Our results demonstrate that explants other than immature embryos are embryogenicaUy competent in barley and that regeneration occurs by both somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our histological sections also showed a differentiation of roots, leafy structures and shoot buds, which is similar to the observations of Weigel and Hughes [29]. Oka et al [18] reported that a barley scutellum-derived callus gave rise to a number of roots without shoots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our histological sections also showed a differentiation of roots, leafy structures and shoot buds, which is similar to the observations of Weigel and Hughes [29]. Oka et al [18] reported that a barley scutellum-derived callus gave rise to a number of roots without shoots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In barley, differences in the production of embryogenic calluses and regenerated plants have been observed when cultures were initiated from apical meristems (Weigel & Hughes 1985), immature embryos (Thomas & Scott 1985;Liihrs & Lorz 1987), immature inflorescences (Thomas & Scott 1985), seedling tissues (Rengel & Jelaska 1986), and leaves (Mohanty & Ghosh 1988). Also, differences have been described in the in vitro embryogenic response among different genotypes (Hanzel et al 1985;Goldstein & Kronstad 1986;L/ihrs & Lorz 1987;Picketing 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In barley, as in all of the cereals, a variety of explants have been successfully used for obtaining morphogenesis in vitro (Jähne-Gärtner and Lörz 1996), of which the most common are apical meristems (Cheng and Smith 1975;Weigel and Hughes 1985), mesocotyles (Jelaska et al 1984;Müller et al 1989), seedling segments (Becher et al 1992), mature embryos (Lupotto 1984;Akula et al 1999) and immature inflorescences (Thomas and Scott 1985;Havrlentovµ et al 2001). However, developmental progression has been limited to cultures capable of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration directly from the explant or via a callus phase using immature embryos (Lührs and Lörz 1987;Dahleen and Bregitzer 2002) or microspores (Jähne et al 1991;Li and Devaux 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%