1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(96)01025-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term relative survival after primary heart valve replacement1

Abstract: The use of relative survival rates tended to modify the difference between subgroups compared with observed survival rates. Relative survival rates reduced the effect of concomitant CABG on survival, but enhanced for example the effect of aortic regurgitation. In patients > or = 70 years of age and patients submitted to aortic or mitral valve replacement with mild or no symptoms, the survival rate was similar for many years to that in the Swedish population at large.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite an increasing trend of more comorbid and complex patients being referred to cardiac surgery, long-term survival remained unchanged throughout the study period. Furthermore, patients undergoing cardiac surgery in Trondheim also showed similar and even somewhat improved observed and relative survival rates compared to older reports from other centres [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Despite an increasing trend of more comorbid and complex patients being referred to cardiac surgery, long-term survival remained unchanged throughout the study period. Furthermore, patients undergoing cardiac surgery in Trondheim also showed similar and even somewhat improved observed and relative survival rates compared to older reports from other centres [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In our study, the ASA scores were higher in patients with valve replacement surgery than in patients with other types of open heart surgery. In addition, even in the absence of any complication, the expected mortality rates of 5% with valve replacement surgery and 10% with combined CABG and valve replacement surgery are higher than the 2% when CABG surgery only is performed [ 21 ]. Forty percent of our patients with valve replacement surgery underwent simultaneous CABG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model's user-friendly input interface permits addition and change of data when required. Many other patient-and surgery-related factors have been shown to influence overall survival after AVR [24,25]. However, at present, the model calculates outcome for an average risk profile only.…”
Section: Limitations Of This Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%