The human primary motor cortex (M1) undergoes considerable reorganization in response to traumatic upper limb amputation. The representations of the preserved arm muscles expand, invading portions of M1 previously dedicated to the hand, suggesting that former hand neurons are reassigned to the control of remaining proximal upper limb muscles. Hand allograft offers a unique opportunity to study the reversibility of such long-term cortical changes. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation in patient LB, who underwent bilateral hand transplantation 3 years after a traumatic amputation, to longitudinally track both the emergence of intrinsic (from the donor) hand muscles in M1 as well as changes in the representation of stump (upper arm and forearm) muscles. The same muscles were also mapped in patient CD, the first bilateral hand allograft recipient. Newly transplanted intrinsic muscles acquired a cortical representation in LB's M1 at 10 months postgraft for the left hand and at 26 months for the right hand. The appearance of a cortical representation of transplanted hand muscles in M1 coincided with the shrinkage of stump muscle representations for the left but not for the right side. In patient CD, transcranial magnetic stimulation performed at 51 months postgraft revealed a complete set of intrinsic hand-muscle representations for the left but not the right hand. Our findings show that newly transplanted muscles can be recognized and integrated into the patient's motor cortex.amputation ͉ longitudinal ͉ plasticity ͉ reorganization ͉ TMS I t is now well established that the adult brain is highly influenced by changes occurring at the body's periphery. Evidence from human and animal models show that, when deprived of its afferent sensory input and/or its motor effectors, the primary sensory (S1) and motor (M1) cortical regions undergo plastic modifications (1-10).Traumatic upper limb amputation in humans produces lifelong consequences. Patients often report a global feeling that the missing body part is still present. This feeling is frequently associated with specific sensory and kinesthetic sensations and pain in the missing limb. Many patients further describe that the phantom limb can be moved voluntarily (review in refs. 11 and 12).Functional investigation of human M1 reorganization after amputation has demonstrated that instead of becoming inactive, the hand area is now activated during proximal limb movements (5,13,14), and that cortical stimulation of this region evokes contraction of proximal upper limb muscles (4, 9, 15, 16). Face and forearm motor representations that surround the representation of the missing hand have also been shown to expand into the de-efferented cortex (16,17), with the expansion of lip movements into the former hand area correlating positively with the amount of phantom limb pain (18). Studies employing TMS paired-pulse protocols have shown less intracortical inhibition in the region corresponding to the amputated limb when compared with the intact limb's region (19,20), suggest...